The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
This Richard Holdship was one of the partners in the porcelain
company, and it was, it appears, for the purposes of this company
that he became lessee of the premises. The company at this time, on
its first formation, appears to have consisted of Dr. John Wall, Mr.
Richard Holdship, the Rev. Benjamin Blayney, and Mr. Samuel Bradley, a
goldsmith, who kept the house in High Street for retailing the ware.
To these were subsequently added the others named above. In 1772–4 the
partners were Dr. Wall, the two William Davises, father and son, Rev.
T. Vernon, Robert Hancock the engraver, and Richard Cook of London. In
1774 Hancock left the concern, and from 1776 to 1783 the two Davises
and Vernon were the only proprietors.
The company at first turned its attention principally to the production
of imitations of the Chinese porcelain, both in form and colour. Thus
the blue and white patterns--then so general in Chinese porcelain, and
the characteristic of the Nankin ware--were for a time, it appears,
exclusively followed at Worcester. Some of the brilliant colours of the
Japanese ceramists were, however, soon attempted, and with complete
success; and by the conventional arrangement of these colours in new
patterns the Worcester potters were gradually led on to more elaborate
productions.
[Illustration: Fig. 452.]
The works must have been commenced on a tolerably large scale, and
have rapidly risen in importance, for in 1752--only a year after the
formation of the company--the premises were very business-like in their
arrangement and extensive in their proportions, and were sufficiently
important to be engraved in the _Gentleman’s Magazine_ of that
year. Of that view the accompanying engraving is a reduced fac-simile,
and it will show at once how soon the works had risen to a state of
importance. The following explanatory references from the Magazine will
make it better understood:--“Explanation. 1. St. Andrew’s. 2. Warmstrey
Slip. 3. Biscuit kilns. 4. Glazing kilns. 5. Great kiln for segurs. 6.
Pressing and modelling gallery. 7. Rooms for throwing, turning, and
stove-drying the ware on the first floor, _a_, of the chamber
floors. 8. The garden. 9. The yard for coals. 10. Mr. Evett’s house
and garden, landlord of the premises. _b_. The eight windows in
two large chambers, in which the ware is placed on stallions, on the
east and north, where are the painters’ rooms. All the beginning of the
process is carried on under the quadrangular building, ground floor,
marked A; in its N.W. angle is the great rowl and ring; in the
N.E. the horses turn the same, and the levigators near to the rowl. The
next (on the ground floor) is the slip and treading-rooms; behind No.
4 is the glazing-room; behind 5 is the secret-room on the ground-floor.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account