The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
An excellent example of dated Caughley ware is the puzzle-jug in
the possession of Mr. Edmund Thursfield, here engraved. It is eight
inches in length, and is formed of the usual body of these works. It
is decorated with blue sprigs, and bears on its front the name, in an
oval border, of “John Geary Cleak of the old Church Brosley 1789.” On
the bottom is written in blue, “Mathew the v & 16,” though one would
fail to see any allusion in the text here referred to either to the
vessel or to its purpose. In Mr. Smith’s possession is a fine Caughley
mug; white, with blue flowers of bold character: it bears the words,
“Wm. Haslewood, 1791,” and has the mark S on the bottom. This William
Haslewood was the representative of an old family of that name in this
neighbourhood, and his property passed to the Mr. J. J. Smith already
spoken of.
In 1788 Mr. Robert Chamberlain commenced his china works at Worcester,
and for some time bought his ware at Caughley, had it sent down by
barge to Worcester, and there painted and finished it. The same
thing was also done when Grainger’s works were first started at
Worcester. The number of hands employed at Caughley must have been
somewhat large, as the premises were extensive, and the quantity of
goods required by Mr. Turner, for his own trade and for Worcester,
was considerable. In 1798 or 1799, in consequence of the increase of
the trade of Mr. Rose, who had been apprenticed to Mr. Turner, and
afterwards commenced on his own account, by which the Caughley business
was much injured, the works were disposed of to Mr. Rose and his
partner; Mr. Turner entirely retiring from the concern. The Caughley
works were then carried on by Messrs. Rose and Co., in conjunction
with their own. The coal at Caughley beginning to work out, and the
cost of carrying the unfinished ware from thence down the hill and
across the water to Coalport was so great,--the unfinished ware being
carried on women’s heads the whole distance,--that Mr. Rose determined
to remove the works to Coalport, which he did at different times,
gradually drafting off the workmen, until about 1814 or 1815, when
they were finally removed, the kilns and rooms taken down, and the
materials used for the enlargement of the works at Coalport. The last
of the buildings, with the house, were not, however, destroyed until
1821, when the materials were brought to Coalport to build the present
burnishing-shops and some workmen’s cottages.
[Illustration: Fig. 587.--The Caughley China Works, taken down
in 1815.]
The works were built in form of a quadrangle, with an entrance gateway
surmounted by an inscribed stone. Of these historical works I am
enabled, through the courtesy of my friend Mr. Hubert Smith, to give
an engraving from an original drawing in his possession. The entrance
building, it will be seen, was three stories in height, the remainder
two stories, and the kilns were of large size.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account