The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
The next example Mr. Croker assigned to the period of James I.
or Charles I. It does not differ very materially in shape from the
preceding specimens. Of pipes of this period, a large variety of shapes
might be adduced. These forms may be understood from the figures in the
accompanying group, copied from engravings of the period. The dates
are, No. 1, 1630; 2, 1632; 3, 1640; 4, 1641. The latter example is
of the same shape as those known to have been in use in the reign of
Elizabeth, and is pretty nearly similar to Mr. Croker’s example. The
same form is found in use through several reigns. The usual shape of
the period, however, will be seen on Figs. 1, 2, and 3.
The barrel-shaped pipe, engraved as an example of the period comprising
the Commonwealth and the reign of Charles II., is from Devonshire,
and may be taken as the usual type of that era. Of this period, the
examples given are chosen principally from Traders’ tokens. One (2)
will be seen to be of the form usually ascribed to William III.’s
reign. The dates of these specimens are 1, 1650; 2, 1666 (Dunstable);
3, 1688 (Chipping Norton); 4, probably same year (Southwark); 5, 1669
(Leeds). Pipes were made at Leeds from a peculiar vein of clay found
there.
Mr. Croker considered the pipes of the reign of William III. to have
had bowls of the elongated form (Figs. 662 and 663), and it would
appear probable that this is correct, for at the places where his
Dutch troops were stationed, the pipes of this and the accompanying
form are most abundant. Barrel-shaped bowls were, however, still in
use, and I have copied one from Mr. Fairholt’s book, on which the
date 1689 is incised. That these long pipes were not imported in very
large quantities, may be gleaned from the following highly interesting
notice, which I quote from Houghton:--
“The next are _tobacco-pipes_, of which came from _Holland_,
gross one hundred and ten, chests four. I have seen some very
long ones and also small from thence, that truly are very fine.
If there comes no more, they’ll do us no great hurt. I think
they must be permitted to be patterns to set our people on work,
and if our smoakers would use none but fine ones, I question not
but we should make as fine as anybody.”[86]
From this it appears that, in 1694, only 110 gross, or four chests,
of Dutch pipes were imported, and this included both sorts--the “very
long ones and also small.” It is worthy of note, for comparison’s sake,
that in the same year from Holland 12,000, and from Germany 23 tons, of
“marbles for boys to play with,” were imported.
[Illustration: Figs. 666 to 676.--Old Broseley Clay Pipes.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account