The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
Wirksworth is much more intimately mixed up with the history of the
Ceramic Art than is usually imagined, and yet but little is known
of the works which were there carried on, or of their productions.
Dugdale, in 1799, says, “About forty years ago, a manufacture of
porcelain was attempted, but it proved unsuccessful.... It was in the
Holland Manor House that the unsuccessful manufacture of porcelain
was attempted;” and Davis, in 1811, repeats the same thing: “In the
Holland Manor House the manufacture of porcelain was attempted, about
forty years ago, but proving unsuccessful, it was relinquished.”
Holland House, where this manufacture was carried on, was the Manor
House of the manor of Holland, otherwise Richmonds, which was given by
Thomas, Earl of Lancaster, to Sir Robert Holland, in which family it
remained until the attainder of Henry Holland, Duke of Exeter, in 1461;
it afterwards belonged to Margaret, Countess of Richmond and Derby,
and was subsequently granted by the Crown to Ralph Gell. In 1745,
Philip Gell leased the manor to “Robert Atkinson and Francis Parry, of
Lincoln’s Inn, gentlemen,” and to “Andrew Wilkinson, of Boroughbridge,
com. York, Esq., and Thomas Wilkinson, Esq., brother of the said Andrew
Wilkinson.” In 1777 it was “leased by Philip Gell, Esq., of Hopton, to
Richard Arkwright, of Cromford, cotton merchant.”
In this latter lease (dated 6th November, 1777), the china works
are thus named: “All those several messuages, tenements, or
dwelling-houses, and all other buildings, warehouses, workshops, and
appurtenances, situate, standing, and being in Wirksworth, in the said
county of Derby, heretofore used for the making and manufacturing of
China Ware, and now in the tenure or occupation of the said Philip
Gell, his assignee or assigns, tenant or under-tenants.” So that at
that time the first china works had probably ceased to be in operation.
In 1793, by deed dated 1st November, Richard Arkwright, Esq., assigned
the remainder of the lease to Charles Hurt, Esq., of Wirksworth, in
the following words: “All those several messuages, tenements, or
dwelling-houses, and all other the buildings, warehouses, workshops,
and appurtenances, situate, standing, and being in Wirksworth,
heretofore used for y^e making and manufacturing of china, but now for
picking cotton.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive