The Chemistry of CookeryWilliams, W. Mattieu (William Mattieu)
Science
The Chemistry of Cookery
Williams, W. Mattieu (William Mattieu)
Cooking
There are many among us who are very proud of their ancient lineage,
and who think it honourable to go back as far as possible and to
maintain the customs of their forefathers; but they all seem to
draw a line somewhere, none desiring to go as far back as to their
inter-glacial troglodytic ancestors, and, therefore, I need not discuss
the desirability of restoring their dietary.
All human beings became cooks as soon as they learned how to make a
fire, and have all continued to be cooks ever since.
We should, therefore, look at this vegetarian question from the
point of view of prepared food, which excludes nearly all comparison
with the food of the brute creation. I say ‘nearly all,’ because
there is one case in which all the animals that approach the nearest
to ourselves—the mammalia—are provided naturally with a specially
prepared food, viz. the mother’s milk. The composition of this
preparation appears to me to throw more light than anything else upon
this vegetarian controversy, and yet it seems to have been entirely
overlooked.
The milk prepared for the young of the different animals in the
laboratory or kitchen of Nature is surely adapted to their structure
as regards natural food requirements. Without assuming that the human
dietetic requirements are identical with either of the other mammals,
we may learn something concerning our approximation to one class or
another by comparing the composition of human milk with that of the
animals in question.
I find ready to hand in Dr. Miller’s ‘Chemistry’, vol. iii., a
comparative statement of the mean of several analyses of the milk of
woman, cow, goat, ass, sheep, and bitch. The latter is a moderately
carnivorous animal, nearly approaching the omnivorous character
commonly ascribed to man. The following is the statement:
+------------------------+-----+------+------+------+-------+-------+
| |Woman| Cow | Goat | Ass | Sheep | Bitch |
+------------------------+-----+------+------+------+-------+-------+
| Water | 88·6| 87·4 | 82·0 | 90·5 | 85·6 | 66·3 |
| Fat | 2·6| 4·0 | 4·5 | 1·4 | 4·5 | 14·8 |
| Sugar and soluble salts| 4·9| 5·0 | 4·5 | 6·4 | 4·2 | 2·9 |
| Nitrogenous compounds | | | | | | |
| and insoluble salts | 3·9| 3·6 | 9·0 | 1·7 | 5·7 | 16·0 |
+------------------------+-----+------+------+------+-------+-------+
According to this it is quite evident that Nature regards our food
requirements as approaching much nearer to the herbivora than to the
carnivora, and has provided for us accordingly.
If we are to begin the building-up of our bodies on a food more nearly
resembling that of the herbivora than that of the carnivora, it is only
reasonable to assume that we should continue on the same principle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account