The Chemistry of CookeryWilliams, W. Mattieu (William Mattieu)
Science
The Chemistry of Cookery
Williams, W. Mattieu (William Mattieu)
Cooking
The particulars of the difference are instructive. The food which
Nature provides for the human infant differs from that provided for the
young carnivorous animal, just in the same way as flesh food differs
from the cultivated and cooked vegetables and fruit within easy reach
of man.
These contain less fat, less nitrogenous matter, more water, and more
sugar (or starch, which becomes sugar during digestion) than animal
food.
Those who advocate the use of flesh food usually do so on the ground
that it is more nutritious, contains more nitrogenous material and more
fat than vegetable food. So much the worse for the human being, says
Nature, when _she_ prepares the food.
But as a matter of practical fact there are no flesh-eaters among us,
none who avail themselves of this higher proportion of albuminoids and
fat. We all practically admit every day in eating our ordinary English
dinner, that this excess of nitrogenous matter and fat is bad; we do
so by mixing the meat with that particular vegetable which contains
an excess of the carbo-hydrates (starch) with the smallest available
quantity of albuminoids and fat. The slice of meat, diluted with the
lump of potato, brings the whole down to about the average composition
of a fairly-arranged vegetarian repast. When I speak of a vegetarian
repast, I do not mean mere cabbages and potatoes, but properly
selected, well cooked, nutritious vegetable food. As an example, I
will take Count Rumford’s No. 1 soup, already described, without the
bread, and in like manner take beef and potatoes without bread. Taking
original weights, and assuming that the lump of potato weighed the same
as the slice of meat, we get the following composition according to the
table given by Pavy, page 410:
+----------------+-------+---------+--------+-------+------+-------+
| | Water | Albumen | Starch | Sugar | Fat | Salts |
| +-------+---------+--------+-------+------+-------+
| Lean beef | 72·00 | 19·30 | -- | -- | 3·60 | 5·10 |
| Potatoes | 75·00 | 2·10 | 18·80 | 3·20 | 0·20 | 0·70 |
| +-------+---------+--------+-------+------+-------+
| |147·00 | 21·40 | 18·80 | 3·20 | 3·80 | 5·80 |
| +-------+---------+--------+-------+------+-------+
|Mean composition| | | | | | |
| of mixture | 73·50 | 10·70 | 9·40 | 1·60 | 1·90 | 2·90 |
+----------------+-------+---------+--------+-------+------+-------+
Rumford’s soup (without the bread afterwards added) was composed
of equal measures of peas and pearl barley, or barley meal, and
nearly equal weights. Their percentage composition as stated in the
above-named table is as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account