The Chicago Massacre of 1812: With Illustrations and Historical DocumentsKirkland, Joseph
History
The Chicago Massacre of 1812: With Illustrations and Historical Documents
Kirkland, Joseph
Chicago (Ill.) -- History; Fort Dearborn Massacre, Chicago, Ill., 1812
The receipt-rolls which I had taken from Mr. Eastman, together with
the balance of money in my hands, fell into the hands of the Indians
on the 15th of August, 1812, when the troops under my command were
defeated near Chicago; what became of them afterwards I know not. I
have no papers in my possession relative to that garrison, excepting
one muster-roll for the month of May, 1812. By it I find that the
garrison there consisted of one captain, one 2nd lieutenant, one
ensign, one surgeon's mate, four sergeants, two corporals, four
musicians and forty-one privates. I cannot determine what the
strength of the garrison was at any other time during the years 1811
and 1812, but it was on the decline. Monthly returns were regularly
submitted to the Adjutant and Inspector-General's office, at
Washington City, which, I suppose, can be found at any time.
I am respectfully sir, your most obedient servant,
Nathan Heald.
Peter Hagner, Esq., }
3rd Auditor's Office, Treasury }
Department, Washington City. }
* * * * *
This brings up to the mind of every officer the terrors of the
"Auditors of the Treasury." Not victory or defeat, not wounds or
even death--nay, not old Time himself can clear a soldier from the
terrible ordeal of the "Accounting Department." Poor Heald had
evidently been asked: "Where is the money which was in your hands
before the savages surrounded you, slaughtered your troops, wounded
yourself and your wife, massacred the civilians under your care,
tortured to death your wounded and burned your fort?" At the same
time the ordnance bureau doubtless asked what had become of the
arms, ammunition, accoutrements and cooking utensils; the commissary
bureau asked after the stores and the quartermaster's bureau after
the equippage. Scores of thousands of volunteer officers in the Union
war found to their cost that their fighting was the only thing which
the War Department kept no record of; that their account-keeping
and reporting was what must be most carefully looked after if they
would free themselves, their heirs, executors and assigns, from
imperishable obligations. For the government knows no "statute of
limitations"--takes no account of the lapse of time any more than
does Nature in her operations. "Contra regem tempus non occurret."
Yet, paradoxical as it may seem, this is right. If all men were
honest, "red tape" could be done away with; but as men are,
individual accountability is indispensable. Without it, the army
might fall into negligence leading to corruption, instead of being,
as it is, the very example of administrational honor and probity.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account