The Chicago Massacre of 1812: With Illustrations and Historical DocumentsKirkland, Joseph
History
The Chicago Massacre of 1812: With Illustrations and Historical Documents
Kirkland, Joseph
Chicago (Ill.) -- History; Fort Dearborn Massacre, Chicago, Ill., 1812
Lalime's letters show that he was a man of ability and education. We
also guess, from a clause in Article III of the treaty of 1821, that
Lalime lived after the manner of those days, and left at least one
half-breed child. The clause reserves a half-section of land for "John
B. Lalime, son of Noke-no-qua."
Miss Noke-no-qua is not otherwise known to history.
The next knowledge we have of Lalime relates to his violent death in
the spring of 1812, about five months before the massacre, at a point
on the south bank of the river within a stone's throw of where is now
the south end of Rush Street bridge.
[Illustration: GURDON SALTONSTALL HUBBARD. (Last picture taken of him.)]
In a letter written by the lamented Gurdon Hubbard to John Wentworth,
June 25th, 1881, we read:
As regards the unfortunate killing of Mr. Lalime by Mr. John Kinzie,
I have heard the account of it related by Mrs. Kinzie and her
daughter, Mrs. Helm. Mr. Kinzie never, in my hearing, alluded to or
spoke of it. He deeply regretted the act. Knowing his aversion to
conversing on the subject, I never spoke to him about it.
Mrs. Kinzie said that her husband and Lalime had for several years
been on unfriendly terms, and had had frequent altercations; that at
the time of the encounter Mr. Kinzie had crossed the river alone,
in a canoe, going to the fort, and that Lalime met him outside the
garrison and shot him, the ball cutting the side of his neck. She
supposed that Lalime saw her husband crossing, and taking his pistol
went through the gate purposely to meet him. Mr. Kinzie, closing with
Lalime, stabbed him and returned to the house covered with blood. He
told his wife what he had done, that he feared he had killed Lalime,
and probably a squad would be sent for him and that he must hide.
She, in haste, took bandages and with him retreated to the woods,
where as soon as possible she dressed his wounds, returning just
in time to meet an officer with a squad with orders to seize her
husband. He could not be found. For several days he was hid in the
bush and cared for by his wife.
Lalime was, I understand, an educated man, and quite a favorite with
the officers, who were greatly excited. They decided he should be
buried near Kinzie's house, in plain view from his front door and
piazza. The grave was enclosed in a picket fence, which Mr. Kinzie,
in his lifetime, kept in perfect order. My impression has ever been
that Mr. Kinzie acted, as he told his wife, in self-defence. This
is borne out by the fact that, after a full investigation by the
officers, whose friend the deceased was, they acquitted Mr. Kinzie,
who then returned to his family.
In some of these details I may be in error, but the fact has always
been firm in my mind that Lalime made the attack, provoking the
killing, in self-defence. Mr. Kinzie deeply regretted the result, and
avoided any reference to it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account