The Children's Story of the War Volume 4 (of 10): The Story of the Year 1915Parrott, Edward
History
The Children's Story of the War Volume 4 (of 10): The Story of the Year 1915
Parrott, Edward
World War, 1914-1918 -- Juvenile literature
The Americans were delighted with this very doubtful promise, and they
believed that they had forced Germany to give up the worst features of
the blockade. If you read the promise carefully, you will see that the
Germans had so worded it that they could still proceed in the old way. A
submarine might give passengers time to get into small boats in
mid-ocean, but how could it ensure their safety? There was a case during
the "blockade" of men who had escaped in a boat being afloat for four
days without food and water, and some of them dying from exposure. Then,
again, the promise only applied to passenger liners, and not to merchant
ships. It was quite easy for a submarine commander to sink a liner, and
then pretend that it had resisted or tried to escape. Above all, nothing
was said about the right of Americans to sail the seas without their
lives being endangered by warships. Nevertheless, the Americans were
delighted with the promise, and plumed themselves greatly on having done
a great service to mankind.
Three days later came a rude awakening. On the night of 4th September
the Allan liner _Hesperian_ was torpedoed by a German submarine _without
warning_. The liner was then 130 miles west of Queenstown She kept
afloat for some time, and was towed towards port, but went down at seven
o'clock on the morning of 6th September. There was a small loss of life,
and there were two Americans on board. It was now clear to everybody
that the German promise was a mere "scrap of paper." Wrath surged up
again in the United States, but it led to nothing. The Germans
untruthfully declared that the vessel was sunk by a mine and not by a
submarine.
During the last three weeks of August and the first week of September
ships of all sorts were sunk at the rate of about sixteen a week. Then
came a rapid falling off, and during the week ending 10th October only
two ships were sent to the bottom. The submarine blockade was fizzling
out. The Germans had changed their policy, not because of the protests
of the Americans, but because they had discovered that the game was not
worth the candle. Mr. Balfour, in a letter to a correspondent, gave the
true reason why the Germans were bringing the blockade to an end. He
said that while the losses of German submarines had been very great, the
British merchant navy was stronger than when the blockade began. Though
many innocent persons, women and children as well as men, had been
robbed and killed, the criminals had paid a heavy toll. The reason why
the Germans had changed their policy was not because the United States
had protested, not because the Germans had revolted against lawless
cruelty. "No. The reason is to be found elsewhere. It is to be found in
the fact that the authors of the submarine policy have had time to
measure its effects, and that deeds which were merely crimes in May, in
September were seen to be blunders."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account