Chinese drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- China
And he had his way. I remember that
whenever this piece of business occurred in the rehearsals, the
man from the Consulate used to giggle.
“Lately I was talking over The Yellow Jacket with Percy
Hammond, dramatic critic. ‘Do you know what made it a success?’
he said, ‘The Property Man as played by Shaw.’ Possibly he’s
right about that. But the play served its artistic purpose.
It made American audiences understand something of this
extraordinary art. And I’ve no doubt but that if Hazelton and
Benrimo had stuck close to the originals our audiences wouldn’t
have understood half so well.”
So far as my experience goes, making love the main theme is not
un-Chinese, but The Property Man as played on our stages is.
Possibly Cantonese usage differs in this respect, but in Peking
property men are always on the stage, coolies dressed in shabby
blue cotton, but they are conspicuous only to the Westerner
not used to Chinese conventions. They by no means have the
importance attached to them in The Yellow Jacket. Compare the
chapter, “External Aspects.”
The Chinese Drama. R. F. Johnston. Kelly & Walsh, 1921.
A slender volume that came to be written because the publishing
firm had four paintings of Chinese actors which they wanted
to issue in calendar form with a few words of comment from
the well-known sinologue. Mr. Johnston became absorbed in the
subject and wrote so much and so interestingly on it that Kelly
& Walsh decided to make a book out of it. The text is much
better than the pictures.
Le Théâtre Chinois. Chu Chia-chien. Paris, 1922.
The chief features of this book are the excellent paintings
and sketches made in Peking theaters by the Russian artist,
Alexandre Jacovleff. An English edition has been published by
Putnam. No other book can give such a vivid notion of the real
appearance as well as the spirit of the Chinese stage as this
volume of inspired drawings. M. Chu Chia-chien, instructor in
the École des Langues Orientales in Paris, writes well, but too
briefly, on the conditions and conventions of the Chinese stage.
Chinesische Literatur. Eduard Erkes. Hirt, Breslau, 1924.
A brief, but up-to-the-minute sketch of Chinese literature.
This volume by a University of Leipzig Privatdozent is one of
a series on the literatures of various nations. The book came
to me too late to include what it said on the origin of the
theater in China in the text, and therefore I shall quote an
interesting paragraph here. (The author speaks of the Pear
Garden origin as a myth and says that the Chinese had a theater
as early as other nations):
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account