The Christian View of the Old TestamentEiselen, Frederick Carl
Religion
The Christian View of the Old Testament
Eiselen, Frederick Carl
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Where {58} man's intellectual powers may hope to attain
to the truth, be it in the region of historical, scientific, and
critical study, we have no warrant to expect an anticipation of results
through the interposition of supernatural instruction in the letter of
scripture.... Scripture is divinely inspired, not to release men from
the toil of mental inquiry, but to lead and instruct their souls in
things of eternal salvation."[32] This is not an arbitrary limitation
of the scope of inspiration; it is a conclusion based upon a careful
consideration of the facts of science and of the Bible, which seem to
furnish sufficient evidence that the biblical writers were not in any
marked degree in advance of their age in the knowledge of physical
facts or laws. In other words, the Bible is primarily a book of
religion, hence religion, and not science, is to be looked for in its
pages. Altogether too much time has been spent in an effort to find in
it scientific truth in a scientific form. Such attempts clearly
disregard the purpose of the biblical writers as interpreted in the New
Testament.
And could a Divine Providence have chosen a different method? Even now
discoveries follow one another so fast in the realm of science that no
book remains a standard work for more than a few years. It seems
obvious, therefore, that a book written thousands of years ago could
not remain a standard scientific work for all times. {59} But assuming
for the sake of argument that God had communicated the knowledge of
scientific facts to these writers--evidence for which is entirely
lacking--what would have been the result? Later occurrences suggest
what might have happened. The great mass of people would have looked
upon teachers of strange science as heretics and madmen, and would have
rejected not only their scientific teaching but their religious
teaching as well. What a loss that would have been to mankind! No
serious loss would come to men if they were left a while longer in
ignorance concerning scientific matters, but very serious loss would
come to them by continuing in their lower religious and ethical beliefs
and practices. The only way to make the higher religious truth
understood was to present it in a form easily apprehended by the
people. To do this is the chief purpose of the primitive,
_prescientific science_ of the Old Testament Scriptures.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account