The chronicles of Enguerrand de Monstrelet, Vol. 05 [of 13] : $b containing an account of the cruel civil wars between the houses of Orleans and Burgundy, of the possession of Paris and Normandy by the English, their expulsion thence, and of other memorable events that happened in the kingdom of France, as well as in other countriesMonstrelet, Enguerrand de
History
The chronicles of Enguerrand de Monstrelet, Vol. 05 [of 13] : $b containing an account of the cruel civil wars between the houses of Orleans and Burgundy, of the possession of Paris and Normandy by the English, their expulsion thence, and of other memorable events that happened in the kingdom of France, as well as in other countries
Monstrelet, Enguerrand de
Europe -- History -- 476-1492 -- Sources; France -- History -- House of Valois, 1328-1589; Hundred Years' War, 1339-1453
On this the cardinals left Burgundy, and, passing through Troyes, went
to Bray and Montereau, where they were handsomely received by the
ambassadors from each party. Thence the cardinal di San Marco went to
Paris, and in the presence of the king, his constable and ministers,
explained the object of his mission, and the infinite advantages that
would result from a peace. After he had been much honoured by the lords
of the court, he returned to the ambassadors at Montereau, where he
and the cardinal d'Orsini remained the whole time of the negotiations,
going daily to the church of La Tombe, wherein the conferences were
held.
They laboured so diligently in this business that a treaty was drawn
up and sworn to by the ambassadors, in the presence of the cardinals,
on condition that the ambassadors should carry copies of it to their
respective lords; and if the terms were not approved of by them, each
party was to remain in the same state as before any negotiations
were begun. Thus some of them went to Paris, to wait on the king and
constable; and others to Troyes, to the queen and the council of the
duke of Burgundy.
These last, on being shewn the treaty, very much approved of it, and
sent it to the duke for his approbation,--who, having examined it with
his ministers, returned for answer, that he accepted it wholly without
exception; that he would cheerfully swear to its observance, and cause
all of his party to do the same.
In like manner, the ambassadors from the king and the constable, on
their arrival at Paris, laid a copy of the treaty before the king, the
dauphin, some of the principal ministers, and most leading citizens,
who were well satisfied that the king should sign it. But when it was
shewn to the count d'Armagnac, to the chancellor, the provost of Paris,
and Raymonnet de la Guerre, they were highly indignant thereat, and
said plainly, that they would never remain in the room where the king
should sign it as it then was. The chancellor even declared, that the
king might seal it himself, for that he never would.
The bishop of Paris, many of the citizens, and several of the ministers
of the king and dauphin, who were very desirous of peace, were
thunderstruck on hearing these declarations, and advised the dauphin
to call a meeting at the Louvre on this matter. He did so; but the
constable would not attend, saying, that those who had agreed to such a
peace, and those who advised the king to consent to it, were traitors.
By these means the peace was prevented: all negotiations were broken
off, and both parties remained in the state they were in before,
without peace or truce. This, however, created very great hatred among
the Parisians to the constable, who nevertheless ordered detachments
against the castles of Montlehery and Marcoussy, possessed by the
Burgundians, but who were obliged to surrender them to the king's
forces. The constable regarrisoned them for the king.
CHAP. II.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account