The Church and the Barbarians: Being an Outline of the History of the Church from A.D. 461 to A.D. 1003 — John Shaqi
The Church and the Barbarians: Being an Outline of the History of the Church from A.D. 461 to A.D. 1003Hutton, William Holden
History
The Church and the Barbarians: Being an Outline of the History of the Church from A.D. 461 to A.D. 1003
Hutton, William Holden
Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500
The position which the emperor thus assumed was not one which the East
alone welcomed. Rome, too, recognised that the East had power to make
decrees, so long as they were consonant with apostolic doctrine.
[Sidenote: The Monophysites.]
Justinian now gave himself eagerly to the reconciliation of the
Monophysites. In 535 Anthimus, bishop of Trebizond, a friend of the
deposed patriarch of Antioch, Severus, who was at least
semi-Monophysite, was elected to the patriarchal throne of New Rome.
In the same year Pope Agapetus (534-6) came to Constantinople as an
envoy of a Gothic king, and he demanded that Anthimus should make
formal profession of orthodoxy. The result was not satisfactory: the
new patriarch was condemned by the emperor with the sanction of the
pope and the approval of a synod. Justinian then issued a decree
condemning Monophysitism, which he ordered the new patriarch to send to
the Eastern Churches. Mennas, the successor of Anthimus, in his local
synod, had condemned and deposed the Monophysite bishops. The
controversy was at an end.
More important in its results was the dispute with the so-called
Origenists. S. Sabas came from {16} Palestine in 531 to lay before the
emperor the sad tale of the spread of their evil doctrines, but he died
in the next year, and the Holy Land remained the scene of strife
between the two famous monasteries of the Old and the New Laura.
[Sidenote: The Origenists.] In 541 or 542 a synod at Antioch condemned
the doctrines of Origen, but the only result was that Jerusalem refused
communion with the other Eastern patriarchate. Justinian himself,--at
a time when there was at Constantinople an envoy from Rome,
Pelagius,--issued a long declaration condemning Origen. A synod was
summoned, which formally condemned Origen in person--a precedent for
the later anathemas of the Fifth General Council--and fifteen
propositions from his writings, ten of them being those which
Justinian's edict had denounced. The decisions were sent for
subscription to the patriarchs of Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem,
as well as to Rome. This sanction gave something of an universal
condemnation of Origenism; but, since no general council confirmed it,
it cannot be asserted that Origen lies under anathema as a heretic.
The opinion of the legalists of the age was utterly out of sympathy
with one who was rather the cause of heresy in others than himself
heretical.
[Sidenote: The "Three Chapters."]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account