The Church of Sancta Sophia, Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine BuildingLethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
Religion
The Church of Sancta Sophia, Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine Building
Lethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
Ayasofya Müzesi
“It is made of unslaked lime and beaten brick most finely powdered and
sifted, cotton wool very thinly pulled and strewed on, and then all
slaked with linseed oil and mixed together: then they use it whilst it
is fresh made, otherwise it hardens immediately.”[349] Such a cement
must have had the hardening qualities of gesso; the oil cements or
mastics used in England some fifty years ago were closely allied in
their composition. Modern mortar has lost much by our neglecting the
tradition of using crushed brick.
Eastern builders spared neither labour nor time in preparing and
testing their materials. Tavernier tells us the waterproof terraces of
the Persian houses were formed of “a layer of lime beaten for eight
days, which became hard like marble.” The materials used in Byzantine
building were tested by long exposure, slaked lime was sealed up in
pits for one or two years; and stones, bricks, and tiles they had
found should not be used new, for, as Vitruvius says, “the only way
of ascertaining their goodness is to try them through a summer and
winter.”
CHAPTER XI
MARBLE MASONRY
§ 1. BUILDING PROCEDURE.
The method and sequence of the building operations as followed by
the Byzantines seem to have been very much as follows. After the
form of the building had been more or less decided, the first thing
necessary was to collect marble monolithic shafts. At S. Sophia the
eight verde-antique shafts match one another very closely; they are
all of one length, and vary from 7½ to 8 diameters in proportion. The
four pairs of porphyry shafts in the exedras differ much more; and,
as we have remarked, those in the western exedras seem to be made
up of separate drums. The proportions of these vary from less than
7 diameters on one side to 8½ on the other. The great monoliths are
the largest known, and of nearly normal classic proportion, so we can
readily see that it was necessary to have a certain knowledge where
such marbles might be quarried or otherwise obtained, before even the
foundations were prepared, for the columns decided the heights and
points of support of the building. These once assured, the body of
the structure was proceeded with as a brickwork shell without further
dependence on the masons, who were only required to prepare bases and
capitals, and then the cornices; everything else was completed as a
brick “carcase.”
At S. Sophia the main square piers are in fact stone, but this was only
for strength, not because they were to be seen finally, any more than
the rough brick.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account