The Church of Sancta Sophia, Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine BuildingLethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
Religion
The Church of Sancta Sophia, Constantinople: A Study of Byzantine Building
Lethaby, W. R. (William Richard)
Ayasofya Müzesi
The next monogram is that read ΒΑϹΙΛΕΩϹ. It occurs in all on fifty-five
columns, the examples of it in our illustration are B.1, E.2, H.1, P.1,
C.2, P.1, G.2, J.2, L.2, N.2, Q.2, the remnant of K.1, shows that this
was similar. This monogram is found also on the capitals of S. Sergius
and Bacchus, and on three beautiful Basket Capitals at S. Mark’s.[415]
Several of the fifty-six, classed together as Justinian, furnish
varieties from the clearest typical form. In some a letter appears
which may be read either as Ε or Β, also an Ω and a sign of
contraction: see M.1 and O.1; possibly this is a combination of
Justinian and Basileos or only a variant spelling: this form occurs in
the church of S. Sergius as well as at S. Sophia.
On twelve capitals is carved the monogram ΘΕΟΔΩΡΑϹ. This is either
designed on the cross form as B.2 F.1, another in the side aisles, and
three in the gynaeceum above, or else as in E.2 it approximates to
Basileos. Two of this latter type also occur in S. Sergius, which shows
how early Justinian associated his wife with him in his architectural
labours.
Finally from S. Sophia, and from there only, we have twelve examples of
ΑΥΓΟΥϹΤΑϹ. Typical ones are shown in G.1, and A.1-A.2; possibly some of
these, as A.1, may have been read Augustus, if any care was taken in
their distribution. The letters on the last capital Q.1 have been read
by Curtis and Aristarches as ϜΜΒΒ. They take Ϝ to be a capital form of
the obsolete letter which is used for 6 or 6,000, Μ is as usual 40, and
Β is 2. Hence they get 6042 for the year of the world. The lower Β is
then explained as the year of an Indiction, reading it as ΙΒ, or 12.
One Indiction period of fifteen years would have ended in 522 A.D.,
and the twelfth year from that would be 534 A.D. equalling 6042 A.M.
Therefore this gives a date, two years after the church was begun, when
they suggest that this capital was put in its place. This ingenious
explanation requires too much adjustment for it to be conclusive, and
the Ϝ form is at least unusual. This monogram looks very white, as if
it had been made up in plaster; if we were assured as to how much is
ancient we might perhaps, if it proved different from the others, find
here the inserted monogram of a later emperor who made repairs.
Salzenberg gives some monogram signatures from the closures under the
great west window, which are carefully carved and entirely different
from rough masons’ marks, although some of the forms occur amongst
those. We were unable to examine them, and taking Salzenberg’s
representation, we can only suggest that they may be the signatures of
master-workers; one appears to be Phocas.
M. Choisy[416] has investigated the masons’ marks of S. Sophia; besides
the ordinary signs, he makes out a system of numbering in the pavement
slabs of the galleries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account