The Church Rate: A Dialogue Between a Churchman and a DissenterRichings, B. (Benjamin)
Religion
The Church Rate: A Dialogue Between a Churchman and a Dissenter
Richings, B. (Benjamin)
Church tax -- Great Britain
Mr. C.—I hardly know what you mean by the principle of Dissent. It was
said, not long since in the House of Commons, that “Dissenters have
always their Dissenting principles, and their conscientious scruples when
they have money to pay, but none when they have money to receive.” {7b}
Mr. S.—Do you mean to insult me by casting such reflections on the
Dissenting body?
Mr. C.—Certainly not. You and I are not going to quarrel after having
known each other for more than five and-twenty years.
Mr. S.—I belong to a body of consistent, conscientious Dissenters; and
you can say nothing against them.
Mr. C.—Do not boast too soon. There are Dissenters here and elsewhere
who call the Church-rate “a dead robbery,” “a scandalous imposition,” “a
vile extortion;” and yet when there is work to be done at the church,
these men, so conscientious—so scrupulous as to where the money is to
come from—are the first to send in their estimates to the churchwardens.
And what would they care if our Church-rate was raised from fivepence to
five shillings in the pound? We know they have a deal to say when they
have little or nothing to pay, but when there is money to be received,
which has been raised by a Church-rate, then their Dissenting principles,
and their conscientious scruples are lighter than a feather.
Mr. S.—I confess that I cannot defend such persons, for I like
consistency. But to turn our conversation to another subject. I am
quite prepared to maintain the excellence of the Voluntary principle.
Mr. C.—I know you Dissenters like to talk about the Voluntary principle.
They are two very fine long words, the use of which is often flattering
to the vanity of ignorant persons.
Mr. S.—And pray, what have you to say against the Voluntary principle?
Mr. C.—I do not wish to say much against it; but I have yet a good deal
to say against the inconsistency of your practice, so directly opposed as
it is to your fine speeches and avowed principles: for I suppose you must
have heard or read something about the Regium Donum.
Mr. S.—Regum Docum! What is that?
Mr. C.—I did not say Regum Docum, that is your Latin, not mine. I said
Regium Donum, which means the royal bounty.
Mr. S.—I am glad that we Dissenters have nothing to do with money from
the State. For “that is a poor religion which cannot support itself.”
Mr. C.—If so, I think I shall prove that your’s is a poor religion.
Mr. S.—But what I say, is, this Regum Dose’em? Is it a sort of physic?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account