The Church, the Falling Away, and the RestorationShepherd, J. W. (James Walton)
Religion
The Church, the Falling Away, and the Restoration
Shepherd, J. W. (James Walton)
Churches of Christ -- Doctrines; Disciples of Christ -- Controversial literature; Disciples of Christ -- Doctrines
canst not bear evil men, and didst try them that call themselves
apostles, and they are not, and didst not find them false” (Rev. 2:1,
2). Thus it appears that what Paul informed the elders of the church at
Ephesus he knew would come to pass after his leaving them. The wolves in
that case claimed to be the accepted apostles of Christ, but were found
liars.
CHAPTER II.
THE FALLING AWAY
The origin of the Roman hierarchial system is obscured in pious frauds;
but it is certain that it arose gradually. As we have already learned,
the apostolic churches had a plurality of elders or bishops. At the
first the elders of any particular congregation would select one of
their number to preside at their meetings for the transaction of
business, and in the course of time he came to be known as “The Bishop.”
Little by little he came to feel his importance till he was exalted
above his fellow elders. This the presbyters would not concede.
Divisions arose out of these troubles, and the authority of the bishops,
closely united among themselves, came victorious over the presbyters,
who opposed them singlehanded. The power and authority of these bishops
were regulated by the prominence of the cities in which they presided.
As Rome was the chief city of the world at that time, the bishops of
cities of less importance regarded it an honor to themselves to concede
to the bishop of Rome the pre-eminence in all things; and so he extended
his authority from time to time, till almost the whole world bowed to
his authority.
The changes which produced this condition are strikingly expressed by
Lyman Coleman. He says:
1. In the college of equal and co-ordinate presbyters, some one would
naturally act as moderator or presiding officer; age, talent,
influence, or ordination by the apostles, might give one an accidental
superiority over his fellows, and appropriate to him the standing
office of president of the presbytery. To this office the title of
bishop was assigned; and with the office and the title began to be
associated the authority of a distinct order. Jerome alleges that the
standing office and authority of a bishop were a necessary expedient
to still the cravings and strife for preferment which by the
instigation of Satan, arose in process of time among the presbyters.
Whatever may have been the cause, a distinction began to be made, in
the course of the second century, between bishops and presbyters,
which finally resulted, in the century following, in the establishment
of the episcopal prerogatives.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account