It is certain that the assigning of the birth of the Lord to Dec. 25
appears first in the West; and it is not till the last quarter of the
fourth century that we find it becoming established in some parts of
the East. St Chrysostom in a homily delivered in A.D. 386 distinctly
relates that it was about ten years earlier the festival of Dec. 25 came
to be observed at Antioch, and that the festival had been observed in
the West from early times (ἄνωθεν)[41]. At Constantinople the festival
was kept on Dec. 25, apparently for the first time, in A.D. 379 or 380;
and about the same time it appears in Cappadocia, as we learn from the
funeral oration on Basil the Great pronounced by his brother, Gregory of
Nyssa. At Alexandria this date was adopted before A.D. 432. At Jerusalem,
however, the Nativity was observed on Jan. 6 not only in the time of the
_Pilgrimage_ of ‘Silvia,’ but, if we may credit the Egyptian monk Cosmas
Indicopleustes, even as late as at the middle of the sixth century. This
writer relates that the people of Jerusalem, arguing from Luke iii. 23
(where, as he interprets the passage, Jesus is said to be _beginning_ to
be thirty years of age at His baptism) celebrated the Nativity together
with the Baptism on Jan. 6[42].
But when did the observance of Dec. 25 make its appearance in the West?
It must have been a well-marked festival at Rome when it appeared in
the Bucherian Kalendar in A.D. 336 (see p. 15). And about one hundred
years earlier (as we learn from his commentaries on Daniel) Hippolytus
was led to infer, partly from a belief (however it originated) that
the Incarnation took place at the Passover, and partly by a process of
calculation with the help of his cycle, that the actual Incarnation
took place on March 25 in the year of the world 5500 (or B.C. 3), and
consequently the Nativity on Dec. 25[43].
The Bishop of Salisbury (J. Wordsworth) offers an ingenious conjecture
which may possibly point to the early Eastern practice of commemorating
the Nativity on Jan. 6 having originated in a similar way. Sozomen, the
historian, writing in the fifth century, states that the Montanists
always celebrated the pascha on the eighth day before the Ides of April
(_i.e._ April 6), if it fell on a Sunday, otherwise on the following
Sunday (_H.E._ vii. 18). The Bishop thinks that the belief that April 6
was the proper day of the pascha ‘may probably have been an opinion quite
unconnected with their [the Montanists’] sect.’ But he rightly admits
that ‘actual facts are not yet forthcoming[44].’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account