In 1263 the Franciscans resolved to celebrate the festival publicly in
their churches. But even the Franciscans were not agreed among themselves
as to the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. Alvarus Pelagius, the
Spanish Theologian, Great Penitentiary of Pope John XXII, in his _de
Planctu Ecclesiae_ (1332) declares that ‘the new and fantastic opinion
should be cancelled by the faithful.’
As is well known, the Dominicans took a strong and even violent part
against the doctrine. The greatest doctor of the thirteenth century,
Thomas Aquinas, had clearly pronounced that St Mary was not sanctified
till the infusion of her _anima rationalis_. But with regard to the feast
of the Conception he states that inasmuch as the Roman Church, though not
celebrating the Conception of the Blessed Virgin, tolerates the practice
of certain Churches which do celebrate it, the celebration of the feast
is not to be wholly reprobated; and he adds that we must not infer from
the observance of the day that St Mary was holy in her conception, but
because we are ignorant as to the time when she was sanctified, the feast
of her sanctification rather than of her conception is celebrated on the
day of her conception[84]. Accordingly in Dominican Kalendars we find
the day marked as _Sanctificatio Mariae_.
The Council of Bâle (1439) adopted a constitution applicable to the whole
Church that the feast should be observed according to the ancient and
laudable custom on Dec. 8, and that it should be known under the title of
the _Conception_ of the Blessed Virgin Mary, forbidding the use of the
name _Sanctification_, as having a less extended use. The Roman See, not
recognising this Council, did not take action till A.D. 1477, when Sixtus
IV, who had been a Franciscan, published an ordinance (and it is the
very first decree of any Pope on the subject) granting large indulgences
to all the faithful who celebrated, or assisted at, the Mass and Office
of the Conception on the festival or throughout its octave. In 1483 the
same Pope pronounced excommunication on any preachers who asserted that
St Mary was conceived in original sin or that those who observed the
festival sinned[85]. Clement VIII (1592-1605) raised the festival to
the rank of a greater double. The later history of the festival can be
pursued in Baillet, and in recent writers dealing with Pius IX.
For minor festivals of the Virgin, such as ‘St Mary at Snows,’ the
Visitation of St Mary, the Espousals (_Desponsatio_), the Most Holy Name
of Mary, the Seven Sorrows, the Rosary of St Mary, Blessed Mary of Mount
Carmel, the Expectation of the Delivery (_partûs_), and others, the
reader may consult Baillet, the _Catholic Dictionary_, etc.
II. _The Orthodox Church of the East._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account