That a fast preliminary to the Pascha was observed in the early Church is
beyond question. Irenaeus, in his letter to Victor, bishop of Rome[112],
states that at the time there were several differences as to the length
of the fast; but in no case was a prolonged series of days prescribed.
‘Some,’ he says, ‘think they ought to fast one day; others, two; others
more than two; others reckon together forty hours both of the day and
the night as the day [of fasting][113].’ And Irenaeus adds that these
differences existed long before (πολὺ πρότερον) the time when he wrote.
The words about the forty hours may perhaps be illustrated by passages
of Tertullian[114], where he speaks of persons fasting in the days ‘when
the bridegroom was taken away,’ or, in other words, the time during which
the Lord was under the power of death, _i.e._ certain hours of the day of
the Crucifixion, the twenty-four hours of Saturday, and certain hours of
the early part of Easter Day. We shall not delay to discuss the questions
connected with the exact time of commencing and of closing the forty
hours.
About the middle of the third century at Alexandria the whole week before
Easter was observed as a time of fasting by some; but there were those
who fasted only on four days; others contented themselves with three or
even two; while there were some (evidently exceptional persons) who did
not fast even one day[115]. It is plain that as yet no fixed rule was
enforced.
In the fourth century we meet with the term τεσσαρακοστή, or
Quadragesima. In the fifth canon of the Council of Nicaea it is ordered
that one of the two annual provincial Synods should be held before
‘the tessarakoste.’ The sense of the term is assumed to be known, and
is not explained. But it must not be inferred that the word necessarily
signifies here forty _days_, or that forty _days_ were assigned to
fasting.
The classical authority for the variations of later usages is the passage
of Socrates[116], where he describes many differences of practice in
his own day (_c._ A.D. 440) and the varieties in the length of the fast
in different countries. At Rome, he says, there was a fast of three
weeks, excepting Saturdays and Sundays; at Alexandria and in Achaia and
Illyricum a fast of six weeks; in other places the fast began seven
weeks before Easter, but was limited to fifteen days, with an interval
between each five days[117]. Not long after his time there were two
prevailing usages—that of the Churches which deducted from the fasting
days Sundays and Saturdays (always excepting the Saturday in Holy Week),
and that of the Churches which deducted only the Sundays. The former was
the prevailing usage in the East; the latter, in the West. The seven
weeks in the East, with thirteen days deducted (seven Sundays and six
Saturdays), and the six weeks of the West, with only six days deducted,
agree precisely in each having only thirty-six fasting days.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account