Cities and towns; Social psychology; Sociology; Sociology, Urban
As long as man is thus attached to the earth and to places on the earth,
as long as nostalgia and plain homesickness hold him and draw him
inevitably back to the haunts and places he knows best, he will never
fully realize that other characteristic ambition of mankind, namely, to
move freely and untrammeled over the surface of mundane things, and to
live, like pure spirit, in his mind and in his imagination alone.
I mention these things merely to emphasize a single point, namely, mind
is an incident of locomotion. The first and most convincing indication
of mind is not motion merely, but, as I have said, locomotion. The
plants don’t locomote, don’t move through space; they respond more or
less to stimulation, even though they have no nerves, but they do not
move through space, certainly not of their own motion. And when they do
move, they have no goal, no destination, and that is because they have
no imagination.
Now it is characteristic of animals that they can and do change their
spots. The ability to do this implies that they are able not merely to
wag a tail or move a limb, but that they are able to co-ordinate and
mobilize the whole organism in the execution of a single act. Mind, as
we ordinarily understand it, is an organ of control. It does not so much
initiate new movements as co-ordinate impulses, and so mobilize the
organism for action; for mind, in its substantive aspect, is just our
disposition to act; our instincts and attitudes, in other words.
Mental activity begins on the periphery, with stimuli which are
antecedent to, but ultimately discharged in, actions. But mind in the
transitive, verbal aspect is a process by which, as we say, we “make up
our minds” or change them; that is to say, it is a process by which we
define the direction in which we are going to move, and locate in
imagination the goal that we intend to seek.
Plants carry on, apparently, all the processes of metabolism which are
characteristic of animals—these are, in fact, what we mean by the
vegetative processes—but they do not go anywhere. If the plants have
minds, as some people assume they do, they must be of that brooding,
vegetative sort characteristic of those mystics who, quite forgetful of
the active world, are absorbed in the contemplation of their own inner
processes. But the characteristic of the animal, and of the higher types
of animal—everything above the oyster, in fact—is that they are made for
locomotion and for action. Furthermore, it is in the processes of
locomotion—involving, as they do, change of scene and change of
location—that mankind is enabled to develop just those mental aptitudes
most characteristic of man, namely, the aptitude and habit of abstract
thought.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account