The Clergyman's Hand-book of Law: The Law of Church and GraveScanlan, Charles Martin
Religion
The Clergyman's Hand-book of Law: The Law of Church and Grave
Scanlan, Charles Martin
Burial laws -- United States; Ecclesiastical law -- United States
*222.* _Privilege, Answer._—When a question concerning a matter privileged
is put, the priest should say: “I claim my privilege as a clergyman and
ask the court not to require me to answer”; “Whatever he said concerning
the matter, was said to me in the confessional as a priest”; “I talked
with him about the matter only in my professional capacity as a priest and
confessor”; “I did not speak to him about the matter except in my
confidential capacity as priest;” or a similar statement that sets up the
clergyman’s privilege without giving facts. A clergyman should not say:
“He confessed it to me,” or “He told it to me in confession,” or give any
other answer that implies what was said in confession, as jurors are
always watching for a hint of what was said. Neither should the priest
say, “I refuse to answer,” without stating that he refuses because of his
privilege as a clergyman. The trial judge or the attorneys trying the case
may put proper questions to determine whether the information was given
the witness in the confessional or in his capacity as confessor.(397)
*223.* _Admissions, False Statements._—Admissions or statements made to a
clergyman not in his capacity of confidential adviser or in the course of
discipline, are not privileged.(398) Neither are false statements made to
a committee investigating charges; but all statements made to such a
committee or an officer of the church, unless false and made with malice,
are privileged.(399)
*224.* _Anonymous Letter, Clergyman._—Where a priest received an anonymous
letter alleged to have been written by a defendant, which he read to her,
he was not disqualified from testifying that she was excited and that she
stated she had no idea how the fire started, and that the letter was
unknown to her, etc.(400) The mere fact that a communication is made to a
clergyman does not make it privileged. It is privileged only when made in
confidence of the relation and under such circumstances as to imply that
it should forever remain a secret in the breast of the confidential
adviser.(401) When a matter is privileged, it is not left to the witness
whether or not he shall testify concerning it; but he can not testify
without the consent of the other party.(402)
*225.* _Voire Dire._—Where a priest made a preliminary examination of a
woman to ascertain her mental capacity to make a confession, her answers
in such preliminary examination were admissible in a contest on a will;
but her confession was not admissible.(403)
*226.* _England, Confession._—The rule is now accorded priests in England,
but was not formerly. Where a priest turned a watch over to its owner, the
court ordered him, under pain of contempt, to tell where he got the
watch.(404) But in another case it was held that a priest need not divulge
the confession of a defendant who was held for crime.(405)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account