The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
Charles IV. had had two sources of strength which his successor entirely
lacked. He could rely upon the enthusiastic loyalty of the Bohemians,
and he was the undisputed head of the Luxemburg family. Neither of his
brothers had ever ventured to oppose his will. But under Wenzel Bohemia
enjoyed neither the prestige nor [Sidenote: Troubles in Bohemia.] the
good government which had endeared Charles to his subjects, while there
was a growing feeling that it was degrading to a Slav people to be ruled
by a German prince and by German methods. The sentiment of race which
had led Poland to unite with Lithuania under Jagello was beginning to be
powerful in Bohemia, in spite of its long and intimate association with
Germany. Wenzel himself was not personally unpopular. The very
coarseness of his character and manners, which degenerated in time into
brutish gluttony and drunkenness, seems to have evoked a rude sympathy,
at any rate among the lower classes. But his reckless passion led him
into gross political blunders, his unconcealed contempt alienated the
clergy, while his patronage of unworthy favourites exasperated the
nobles. A series of disorderly revolts began in 1387, and followed each
other in rapid succession. And Wenzel’s kinsmen, instead of assisting
the head of their house, rather added to his embarrassments. The evil
genius of the family was his cousin, Jobst of Moravia, a man who
anticipated the Italians of the next century in his selfish cunning and
his complete disregard of moral rules. Jobst had already gained
Brandenburg by trading on the pecuniary difficulties of Sigismund, and
he hoped by discrediting Wenzel to obtain for himself the Bohemian and
the imperial crowns. In 1394 he was at the head of a baronial revolt, in
which Wenzel was seized and imprisoned by the rebels. The most loyal
member of the family, John of Görlitz, who succeeded in releasing his
brother, was treated by Wenzel with gross ingratitude, and died in 1396,
not without grave suspicions of poison. Sigismund, though absorbed in
the pursuit of his own ends, was less cynically selfish than Jobst, and
showed some regard for the dignity and interests of his house. But he
was prevented from giving Wenzel any real assistance or guidance by the
necessity of defending his own kingdom of Hungary against the Turks. In
1396 he led a large crusading army to be cut to pieces by the forces of
Bajazet I. on the field of Nicopolis. But for the advance of the Tartars
under Timour, eastern Europe would have been at the mercy of the
victorious sultan.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account