The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
The man who had done more than any one to procure the summons of the
Council, and whose interests were most closely [Sidenote: Parties at
Constance.] bound up in its success, was Sigismund, King of the Romans
and potential Emperor. He was eager to terminate the schism, and to
bring about such a reform in the Church as would prevent the recurrence
of similar scandals. But his motive in this was not merely disinterested
devotion to the interests of the Church. He wished to revive the
prestige of the Holy Roman Empire, and to gratify his own personal
vanity, by posing as the secular head of Christendom and the arbiter of
its disputes. More especially he wished to restore the authority of the
monarchy in Germany, and to put an end to that anarchic independence of
the princes, of which the recent schism was both the illustration and
the result. In pursuing this aim he was confronted by the champions of
‘liberty’ and princely interests, who were represented at Constance by
the Archbishop of Mainz and Frederick of Hapsburg, Count of Tyrol. The
archbishop, John of Nassau, had been prominent in effecting and
prolonging the schism in the Empire. He was a firm supporter of John
XXIII., and had no interest in attending the Council except to thwart
the designs of the king, whom he had been the last to accept. Frederick
of Tyrol was the youngest son of that Duke Leopold who had fallen at
Sempach in the war with the Swiss. Of his father’s possessions Frederick
had inherited Tyrol and the Swabian lands, and the propinquity of his
territories made him a powerful personage at Constance. His family was
the chief rival of the House of Luxemburg for ascendency in eastern
Germany, and he himself seems to have cherished a personal grudge
against Sigismund. To these enemies Sigismund could oppose two loyal
allies, the Elector Palatine Lewis, who had completely abandoned the
anti-Luxemburg policy pursued by his father Rupert, and Frederick of
Hohenzollern, the most prominent representative of national sentiment in
Germany, who had already given in Brandenburg an example of that
restoration of order which he wished Sigismund to effect throughout his
dominions.
Of the clerical members of the Council the most prominent at the
commencement was the Pope John XXIII. He had been forced by his
difficulties in Italy to issue the summons, but as the time for the
meeting approached he felt more and more misgiving. His one object was
to maintain himself in office; but he was conscious that neither
Sigismund nor the cardinals would hesitate to throw him over if he stood
in the way of the restoration of unity. He therefore allied himself with
Sigismund’s opponents, the Elector of Mainz and Frederick of Tyrol, and
spared no pains to bring about dissension between Sigismund and the
Council.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account