The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
The assembled clergy may be divided roughly into two parties: the
reformers, and the conservative or ultramontane [Sidenote: Clerical
parties.] party. The reformers were not in favour of any radical change
in the Church. They were if anything more vehemently opposed than their
antagonists to the doctrines of Wyclif and Hus. Such reform as they
desired was aristocratic rather than democratic. They had no intention
of weakening the authority of the Church; but within the Church they
desired to remove gross abuses, and to strengthen the hierarchy as
against the Papacy. Their chief contention was that a General Council
has supreme authority, even over the Pope, and they wished such councils
to meet at regular intervals. By this means papal absolutism would be
limited by a sort of oligarchical parliament within the Church. The
conservatives, on the other hand, consisting chiefly of the cardinals
and Italian prelates, had no wish to alter a system under which they
enjoyed material advantages. Their object, as it had been at Pisa, was
to restore the union of the Church, but to defeat, or at any rate
postpone, any schemes of reform.
The Council was opened on November 5, but the meeting was only formal,
and no real business was transacted for a month. Meanwhile Hus had been
followed to Constance by the representatives of the orthodox party in
Bohemia, who brought a formidable list of charges against the reformer.
John XXIII. at once saw in this an opportunity for embroiling the
Council with Sigismund. Adroitly keeping himself in the background, he
allowed the cardinals to take the lead in the matter. They summoned Hus
to appear before them, and in spite of his protest that he was only
answerable to the whole Council, they committed [Sidenote: Hus
imprisoned.] him to prison. The news that his safe-conduct had been so
insultingly disregarded reached Sigismund as he was starting for
Constance after the coronation ceremony at Aachen. He arrived on
Christmas day, and at once demanded that Hus should be released. The
Pope excused himself, and threw the blame on the cardinals. To the
king’s right to protect his subject the cardinals opposed their duty to
suppress heresy. In high dudgeon, Sigismund declared that he would leave
the Council to its fate, and actually set out on his return journey. The
Pope was jubilant at the success of his wiles. But Sigismund’s friends,
and especially Frederick of Hohenzollern, urged him not to sacrifice the
interests of Germany and of Christendom for the sake of a heretic. This
advice, and the feeling that his personal reputation was staked on the
success of the Council, triumphed. Sigismund returned to Constance, and
Hus remained a prisoner. From this moment John XXIII. began to despair.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account