The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.Lodge, Richard, Sir
History
The Close of the Middle Ages, 1272-1494, 3rd Ed.
Lodge, Richard, Sir
Middle Ages
While these events were going on at home, Venice was keenly interested
in Eastern affairs. Now that Constantinople [Sidenote: Venice and the
Turks.] had fallen, it was no longer possible to pursue the old policy
of bolstering up the Eastern Empire as a buffer between the Turks and
Venetian possessions. Two alternative courses were open to the republic.
She might take the place of Constantinople and become the bulwark of
Christendom against the infidel. Or she might endeavour to secure the
continuance of Venetian commerce in the east by making an advantageous
treaty with the conquerors. The heroic policy was advocated by Foscari,
the more cautious and selfish policy by his opponents, and the declining
credit of the doge enabled them to carry the day. In April 1454 a treaty
was concluded with Mohammed II. On payment of a yearly tribute, the
Venetians were allowed to retain their ports and other possessions in
the east, and to continue their Levant trade in temporary security. A
district in Constantinople was assigned for the residence of Venetian
merchants under a Venetian bailiff. It was no small argument in favour
of this treaty that it enabled Venice to strike another blow at her old
rival Genoa. The Genoese had for some time aided the Turks in various
ways, and had received the promise of special trade privileges as their
reward. But the Sultan found it cheaper to buy off the hostility of a
possible foe than to pay the stipulated price for services already
rendered.
For a few years Venice profited by the treaty of 1454, and abstained
from giving aid to the struggling Christian populations, either of the
Balkan provinces or of Greece. But the Turkish conquests were too
extensive and rapid not to awaken serious misgivings. In spite of the
famous relief of Belgrad by Hunyadi, Servia was reduced, and Wallachia
and Bosnia were overrun without serious resistance. Only Albania, under
the heroic Scanderbeg, succeeded by desperate efforts in prolonging its
independence, and in extorting terms from the Sultan. It was more
alarming to the Venetians when the Turkish armies crossed the isthmus
into the Morea, and equipped a fleet for the conquest of Lesbos and the
other islands in the Ægean. The most strenuous opponents of war had to
admit the uselessness of a paper treaty to restrain a conqueror so
unscrupulous as Mohammed II. At this juncture, Pope Pius II. was making
strenuous efforts to rouse the princes of Western Europe to a crusade
against the Turks. Venice was convinced that the further maintenance of
peace was impossible; and if the pope could secure them allies in the
name of religion, their prospects of success would be improved. But
these hopes of assistance were doomed to disappointment, when, in 1464,
Pius proceeded to Ancona to welcome and bless the crusading host. The
Venetian fleet was the only efficient force which Christendom had
furnished in response to the demand of its ecclesiastical chief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account