The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce, Volume 09: Tangential ViewsBierce, Ambrose
General
The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce, Volume 09: Tangential Views
Bierce, Ambrose
American essays; American literature
What is true of men is true of horses. Strength, which implies size, is
necessary in the horse militant, particularly in the artillery; but it
is got at the expense of agility and endurance. The “toughest” American
horse is the little Western “cayuse,” the “Indian pony” of our early
literature.
This matter of so-called “degeneration” in the stature of men and
animals has a more than military interest. It is not without meaning
that all peoples have traditions of giants, and that all literatures
are full of references to a remote ancestry of superior size and
strength. Even Homer tells of his heroes before the walls of Troy
hurling at one another such stones as ten strong men of his degenerate
day could not have lifted from the earth.
The kernel of truth in all this is that the human race is actually
decreasing in size. But this is not “degeneration.” It is improvement.
Where are the megatherium, the dinosaurus, the mammoth and the
mastodon? Where is the pterodactyl? What has happened to the moa and
the other gigantic bird whose name I do not at this moment recall—maybe
the epiornis? Condemned and executed by Nature for unfitness in the
struggle for existence. The elephant, the hippopotamus and the
rhinoceros are traveling the same road to extinction, and the late
American bison could show them the way.
What is the disadvantage of bulk in animals? Feebleness. For an animal
twice as heavy as another of the same species to have the same activity
it would have to be not twice as strong, but four times as strong; and
for some reason to this deponent unknown, Nature does not make it so.
If four times as large, it would need to be sixteen times as strong.
Observe the large birds; the little ones, the swallows and “hummers,”
can fly circles around them. The biggest of them can not fly at all
and their wings, from disuse, are vestigial. Many insects can fly, not
only proportionately faster and farther than even the humming-bird,
but actually. Is there, possibly, a lesson in this for the ingenious
gentlemen who expect the freight and passenger business of the future
to be done in the air?
We are all familiar with the fact that if a man were as strong and
agile in proportion as a flea he could leap several miles; one can
figure out the exact number for oneself. If as strong as an ant he
could shoulder and lug away a six-inch rifle and its carriage.
Doubtless in the course of evolution (if evolution is permanent) man
(if man is spared) will have the ant’s strength—and the ant’s size.
Considering the advantages that the smaller insects and animalculæ
have in the struggle for existence and the wonderful powers and
capacities it must have developed in them—which we know, indeed, from
such observers as Sir John Lubbock it actually has developed in the
ant—I can see no reason to doubt that some of them have attained a high
degree of civilization and enlightenment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account