The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 02 (of 12) — John Shaqi
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 02 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 02 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
‘Boys, when at full liberty, and thus kept in health and exercise, are
eager at play. The games most common at Newmarket, were fives, spell and
null, marbles, chuck-farthing, and spinning tops, at which, as well as
marbles and fives, I excelled. Another game called holes, was
occasionally played by a few of the boys. This was a game of some little
study, and was much delighted in by the shepherd boys and men, who
tended their flocks on that vast plain (as then it was) on which
Newmarket stood. Three squares were cut in the earth, one within the
other, in each side of which were three holes. Each antagonist had nine
warriors or bits of stick to combat the opposing nine. What the rules of
the game were, I have forgotten; but I believe the most essential of
them was, that he was the victor who could imprison his adversary’s men,
or leave them no further space to move in. If the choice of the move
were given, I, and other good players, knew how to win at this game with
certainty. Till I discovered the secret, I was greatly devoted to the
game.
‘In order to have fair play allowed me at these different games, I had
my little infant labours of Hercules to perform; or, to speak more
properly and plainly, to fight my way, and convince all the boys of my
own age, I was not to be cowed by them. All boys are wranglers; and out
of this propensity the elder boys at Newmarket take pleasure in creating
themselves diversion. Jack Clarke, who was about seventeen, was a very
good natured, peaceable lad: but all the others in our stable were very
assiduous in exciting the little ones to quarrel, and persuading him,
who would have wished to remain at peace, to believe he must certainly
be a coward. This stigma I was not willing to be loaded with: the
consequence was, that battle after battle was fought, first between me
and Jack, and then between me and Tom, for two of us were so named. Jack
had been a shepherd boy, was older by some months than myself, preceded
me as a jockey, was a most inveterate, obstinate, and unfair antagonist,
for he would bite, kick, or do any thing to gain the victory, was quite
as strong as myself, and excessively hardy. However, he entirely wanted
method and presence of mind; and after three or four desperate contests,
he was obliged fairly to own he was not my equal. Tom, who came into the
service after me, was likewise older, larger-limbed, and had more
strength; but my conquest of him was much more easy. He had bones,
sinews, and thews, as Shakspeare says, but little heart; he was
prevailed on to venture a second combat, but not a third. I had the good
fortune also to face and outface those among Lord March’s boys, who
lived opposite to us, and with whom we had continual intercourse; so
that, though I was but thirteen, I became the acknowledged hero among
the boys of both stables, under fifteen years of age. Thus much for the
footing on which I stood with my rivals within the first half-year after
I came to live with John Watson.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account