The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 02 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 02 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
These lines can hardly fail of being acceptable to the reader, when he
is told, they were the last ever written by a man, to whom we are
indebted for some of the most pleasing and elegant pastoral descriptions
in the language.—It must abate something of the contempt with which we
are too apt to mention the name of a strolling player, when we recollect
that Cunningham was one.
Mr Holcroft had never been satisfied with his employment as a strolling
actor in the country. He sighed for the literary advantages, and
literary intercourse which London afforded. He was indeed the whole time
labouring hard to cultivate his mind, and acquire whatever information
was within his reach. But his opportunities were very confined. He had
studied Shakespeare with the greatest ardour, and with some advantage to
himself in his profession. Polonius was the character in which he was
most successful: he also played Hamlet, and other parts, of which he was
but an indifferent representative. I have been told, that Mr Holcroft’s
acting, both in its excellences and defects, more resembled Bensley’s
than any other person’s. The excellent sense and judgment of that able
actor were almost entirely deprived of their effect, by his
disadvantages of voice and manner. Mr Holcroft, in the performance of
grave parts, had the same distinct, but harsh articulation, and the same
unbending stiffness of deportment.
After wandering for seven years as an itinerant actor, with no very
brilliant success, he resolved upon trying his fortune in London, and
arrived there early in the latter end of 1777. His stay with the last
company, which he joined, must therefore have been short. His separation
from this company was I believe in some measure hastened by little
disagreeable circumstances, but it was no doubt chiefly owing to the
general bias of his inclination, to the desire and expectation of fame
of some sort or other, either theatrical or literary, on which his mind
had for some years been brooding. It is not likely that his success on
the stage, though it might in time have ensured him a livelihood in
inferior parts, would ever have been such as to satisfy the ambition of
an aspiring and vigorous mind. It was, however, on his talents as an
actor, that he first rested his hopes of pushing his fortune in London,
and of recommending himself to the favour of the public. But before we
follow him up to town, it may not be improper to take a retrospect of
the path we have already trod. There are some persons of nice tastes,
who may perhaps be disgusted with the meanness of his adventures; and
who may think the situation in which he embarked in life, and the
society into whose characters and manners he seems to have entered with
so much relish, unworthy of a man of genius.
But it should be recollected, first, that men of genius do not always
chuse their own profession or pursuit. In Mr Holcroft’s case, the
question was, whether he should turn strolling player, or starve.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account