The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
his spleen. Such is the constitutional slenderness of his
understanding, its ‘glassy essence,’ that the slightest collision of
sentiment gives an irrecoverable shock to him. He regards a Catholic
or a Presbyterian, a Deist or an Atheist, with equal repugnance, and
makes no difference between the Pope, the Turk, and the Devil. He
thinks a rival poet a bad man, and would suspect the principles,
moral, political, and religious, of any one who did not spell the word
_laureate_ with an _e_ at the end of it.—If Mr. Southey were a bigot,
it would be well; but he has only the intolerance of bigotry. His
violence is not the effect of attachment to any principles,
prejudices, or paradoxes of his own, but of antipathy to those of
others. It is an impatience of contradiction, an unwillingness to
share his opinions with others, a captious monopoly of wisdom,
candour, and common sense. He is not an enthusiast in religion, but he
is an enemy to philosophers; he does not respect old establishments,
but he hates new ones; he has no objection to regicides, but he is
inexorable against usurpers; he will tell you that ‘the re-risen cause
of evil’ in France yielded to ‘the Red Cross and Britain’s arm of
might,’ and shortly after he denounces this Red Cross as the scarlet
whore of Babylon, and warns Britain against her eternal malice and
poisoned cup; he calls on the Princess Charlotte in the name of the
souls of ten thousand little children, who are without knowledge in
_this age of light_, ‘SAVE OR WE PERISH,’ and yet sooner than they
should be saved by Joseph Fox or Joseph Lancaster, he would see them
damned; he would go himself into Egypt and pull down ‘the barbarous
kings’ of the East, and yet his having gone there on this very errand
is not among the least of Bonaparte’s crimes; he would ‘abate the
malice’ of the Pope and the Inquisition, and yet he cannot contain the
fulness of his satisfaction at the fall of the only person who had
both the will and the power to do this. Mr. Southey began with a
decent hatred of kings and priests, but it yielded to his greater
hatred of the man who trampled them in the dust. He does not feel much
affection to those who are born to thrones, but that any one should
gain a throne as he has gained the laureate-wreath, by superior merit
alone, was the unpardonable sin against Mr. Southey’s levelling Muse!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account