The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
In this inverted ratio, the bungling impostors of former times, and less
refined countries, got no further than stocks and stones: their utmost
stretch of refinement in absurdity went no further than to select the
most mischievous animals or the most worthless objects for the adoration
of their besotted votaries: but the framers of the new law-fiction of
legitimacy have started a non-entity. The ancients sometimes worshipped
the sun or stars, or deified heroes and great men: the moderns have
found out the image of the divinity in Louis XVIII.! They have set up an
object for their idolatry, which they themselves must laugh at, if
hypocrisy were not with them the most serious thing in the world. They
offer up thirty millions of men to it as its victims, and yet they know
that it is nothing but a scare-crow to keep the world in subjection to
their renegado whimsies and preposterous hatred of the liberty and
happiness of mankind. They do not think kings gods, but they make
believe that they do so, to degrade their fellows to the rank of brutes.
Legitimacy answers every object of their meanness and malice—_omne tulit
punctum_.—This mock-doctrine, this little Hunchback, which our
resurrection-men, the Humane Society of Divine Right, have foisted on
the altar of Liberty, is not only a phantom of the imagination, but a
contradiction in terms; it is a prejudice, but an exploded prejudice; it
is an imposture, that imposes on nobody; it is powerful only in
impotence, safe in absurdity, courted from fear and hatred, a dead
prejudice linked to the living mind; the sink of honour, the grave of
liberty, a palsy in the heart of a nation; it claims the species as its
property, and derives its right neither from God nor man; not from the
authority of the Church, which it treats cavalierly, and yet in contempt
of the will of the people, which it scouts as opposed to its own: its
two chief supporters are, the sword of the Duke of Wellington and the
pen of the Editor of _The Times_! The last of these props has, we
understand, just failed it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account