The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
Mr. Coleridge thinks that this triumph over himself and the
Poet-laureate is a triumph to us. God forbid! It shews that he knows as
little about us as he does about himself. This question of apostacy may
be summed up in a very few words:—First, if Mr. Southey is not an
apostate, we should like to know who ever was? Secondly, whether the
term, apostate, is a term of reproach? If it has ceased to be so, it is
another among the triumphs of the present king’s reign, and a greater
proof than any brought forward in the Quarterly Review, of the progress
of public spirit and political independence among us of late years! A
man may change his opinion. Good. But if he changes his opinion as his
interest or vanity would prompt, if he deserts the weak to go to the
stronger side, the change is a suspicious one! and we shall have a right
to impute it rather to a defect of moral principle than to an accession
of intellectual strength. Again, no man, be he who he may, has a right
to change his opinion, and to be violent on opposite sides of a
question. For the only excuse for dogmatical intolerance is, that the
person who holds an opinion is totally blinded by habit to all
objections against it, so that he can see nothing wrong on his own side,
and nothing right on the other; which cannot be the case with any person
who has been sincere in the opposite opinion. No one, therefore, has a
right to call another ‘the greatest of scoundrels’ for holding the
opinions which he himself once held, without first formally
acknowledging that he himself was the greatest of hypocrites when he
maintained those opinions. When Mr. Southey subscribes to these
conditions, we will give him a license to rail on whom and as long as he
pleases: but not—_till then_! Apostates are violent in their opinions,
because they suspect their truth, even when they are most sincere: they
are forward to vilify the motives of those who differ from them, because
their own are more than suspected by the world! We proceed to notice the
flabby defence of ‘the _Wat Tyler_,’ from the well-known pen of Mr.
Coleridge, which, as far as we can understand it, proceeds upon the
following assumptions:—
1. _That Mr. Southey was only 19 when he wrote it, and had forgotten,
from that time to this, all the principles and sentiments contained in
it._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account