The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
3. _Mr. Coleridge compares us to the long-eared virtuoso, the ass, that
found Apollo’s lute, ‘left behind by him when he ascended to his own
natural place, to sit thenceforward with all the Muses around him,
instead of the ragged cattle of Admetus.’_
_Answer._ Now it seems that Mr. Coleridge and other common friends of
his, such as the author of the Fall of Robespierre and of Democratic
Lectures, or Lectures on Democracy, in the year 1794, knew a good deal
of Mr. Southey before he dropped this lute. Were they the ragged cattle
of Admetus that Mr. Southey was fain to associate with during his
obscure metamorphosis and strange Jacobin disguise? Did the Coleridges,
the Wordsworths, the Lloyds and Lambs and Co. precede the Hunts, the
Hazlitts, and the Cobbetts, in listening to Mr. Southey ‘tuning his
mystic harp to praise Lepaux,’ the Parisian Theophilanthropist? And is
it only since Mr. Southey has sat ‘quiring to the young-eyed cherubim,’
with the Barrymores, the Crokers, the Giffords, and the Stroehlings,
that his natural genius and moral purity of sentiment have found their
proper level and reward? Be this as it may, we plead guilty to the
charge of some little indiscreet admiration of the Apollo of Jacobinism.
We did not however find his lute three and twenty years after he had
dropped it ‘in a thistle.’ We saw it in his hands. We heard him with our
own ears play upon it, loud and long; and we can swear he was as well
satisfied with his own music as we could be. ‘_Asinos asinina
decent_,’—a bad compliment, in the style of _Dogberry_, which Mr. C.
pays to his friend and to himself, as one of his early ragged auditors.
Now whether Mr. Southey has since that period ascended to heaven or
descended to the earth, we shall leave it to Mr. Coleridge himself to
decide. For he says, that at the time when the present poet-laureate
wrote _Wat Tyler_, he (Mr. Southey) was ‘a young man full of glorious
visions concerning the possibilities of human nature, because his lofty,
imaginative, and innocent spirit, had mistaken its own virtues and
powers for the average character of mankind.’—Since Mr. Southey went to
court, he has changed his tone. _Asinos asinina decent._ Is that Mr.
Coleridge’s political logic?[35]
4. _That Mr. Southey did not express his real opinions, even at that
time, in Wat Tyler, which is a dramatic poem, in which mob-orators and
rioters figure, with appropriate sentiments, as Jack Cade may do in
Shakespear._
_Answer._ This allusion to the dramatic characters of Shakespear is
certainly unfortunate, and Mr. Coleridge himself hints as much. Rioters
and mob-preachers are not the only persons who appear in ‘the _Wat
Tyler_.’ The King and the Archbishop come forward in their own persons,
according to Mr. Coleridge, with appropriate sentiments, labelled and
put into their mouths. For example:—
_Philpot._ Every moment brings
Fresh tidings of our peril.
_King._ It were well
To yield them what they ask.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account