The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 03 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
Southey—has suggested as an answer,—By not withdrawing the Poems, he
pockets the receipts; and by getting an Injunction against _Wat Tyler_,
he would have done the same thing. In p. 23, Mr. Southey states, that he
is ‘in the same _rank in society_’ as Mr. Smith, which we have yet to
learn: and that he and Mr. Smith ‘were cast by nature in different
moulds,’ which we think was lucky for the Member for Norwich. In p. 25,
Mr. Southey rails at ‘the whole crew of ultra Whigs and Anarchists, from
Messrs. Brougham and Clodius, down to Cobbett, Cethegus and Co.’; and in
pages 26, 27, he compliments himself: ‘I ask you, Sir, in which of my
writings I have appealed to the base and malignant feelings of
mankind;—and I ask you, whether the present race of revolutionary
writers appeal to any other? What man’s private character did I stab?
Whom did I libel? Whom did I slander? Whom did I traduce? THESE
MISCREANTS LIVE BY CALUMNY AND SEDITION: THEY ARE LIBELLERS AND LIARS BY
TRADE.’—After this, _Sir Anthony Absolute’s_ ‘Damn you, can’t you be
cool, like me?’ will hardly pass for a joke! ‘For a man to know another
well, were to know himself.’
But we must conclude, and shall do so, with some passages taken at a
venture. ‘I did not fall into the error of those, who, having been the
friends of France when they imagined that the cause of liberty was
implicated in her success, transferred their attachment from the
Republic to the military tyranny in which it ended, and regarded with
complacency the progress of oppression, because France was the
oppressor.’ What does Mr. Southey call that military establishment which
is at present kept up in France to keep the Bourbons on the throne, and
to keep down the French people? Mr. Southey has, it seems, transferred
his attachment from the Republic, not to Bonaparte, but to the Bourbons.
_They_ stand Mr. Southey instead of the Republic; they are the true
‘children and champions of Jacobinism’; the legitimate heirs and
successors of the Revolution. We have never fallen into that error—into
the error of preferring the monstrous claim of hereditary and perpetual
despotism over whole nations, to a power raised to whatever height, (a
gigantic, but glorious height) in repelling that monstrous claim; a
claim set up in contempt of human nature and human liberty, and never
quitted for a single instant; the unwearied, implacable, systematic
prosecution of which claim, to force the doctrine of Divine Right on the
French people, caused all the calamities of the Revolution, all the
horrors of anarchy, and all the evils of military despotism, with loss
of liberty and independence; and the restoring and hallowing of which
claim, to hold mankind as slaves in perpetuity, Mr. Southey hails as the
deliverance of mankind, and ‘a consummation devoutly to be wished.’ ‘O
fool, fool, fool!’ He cannot go along with France when France becomes
the oppressor; nor can he leave the Allies when they become the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account