The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 06 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 06 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
There are whole families who are born classical, and are entered in the
heralds’ college of reputation by the right of consanguinity.
Literature, like nobility, runs in the blood. There is the B— family.
There is no end of it or its pretensions. It produces wits, scholars,
novelists, musicians, artists in ‘numbers numberless.’ The name is alone
a passport to the Temple of Fame. Those who bear it are free of
Parnassus by birth-right. The founder of it was himself an historian and
a musician, but more of a courtier and man of the world than either. The
secret of his success may perhaps be discovered in the following
passage, where, in alluding to three eminent performers on different
instruments, he says, ‘These three illustrious personages were
introduced at the Emperour’s court,’ &c.; speaking of them as if they
were foreign ambassadours or princes of the blood, and thus magnifying
himself and his profession. This overshadowing manner carries nearly
every thing before it, and mystifies a great many. There is nothing like
putting the best face upon things, and leaving others to find out the
difference. He who could call three musicians ‘personages,’ would
himself play a personage through life, and succeed in his leading
object. Sir Joshua Reynolds, remarking on this passage, said, ‘No one
had a greater respect than he had for his profession, but that he should
never think of applying to it epithets that were appropriated merely to
external rank and distinction.’ Madame D—, it must be owned, had
cleverness enough to stock a whole family, and to set up her
cousin-germans, male and female, for wits and virtuosos to the third and
fourth generation. The rest have done nothing, that I know of, but keep
up the name.
The most celebrated author in modern times has written without a name,
and has been knighted for anonymous productions. Lord Byron complains
that Horace Walpole was not properly appreciated, ‘first, because he was
a gentleman, and secondly, because he was a nobleman.’ His Lordship
stands in one, at least, of the predicaments here mentioned, and yet he
has had justice, or somewhat more, done him. He towers above his fellows
by all the height of the peerage. If the poet lends a grace to the
nobleman, the nobleman pays it back to the poet with interest. What a
fine addition is ten thousand a year and a title to the flaunting
pretensions of a modern rhapsodist! His name so accompanied becomes the
mouth well: it is repeated thousands of times, instead of hundreds,
because the reader in being familiar with the Poet’s works seems to
claim acquaintance with the Lord,
‘Let but a lord once own the happy lines:
How the wit brightens, and the style refines!’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account