The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 08 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 08 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
MR. KEAN’S RICHARD II.
_The Examiner._
_March 19, 1815._
We are not in the number of those who are anxious in recommending the
getting-up of Shakespear’s plays in general, as a duty which our
stage-managers owe equally to the author, and the reader of those
wonderful compositions. The representing the very finest of them on the
stage, even by the best actors, is, we apprehend, an abuse of the genius
of the poet, and even in those of a second-rate class, the quantity of
sentiment and imagery greatly outweighs the immediate impression of the
situation and story. Not only are the more refined poetical beauties and
minuter strokes of character lost to the audience, but the most striking
and impressive passages, those which having once read we can never
forget, fail comparatively of their effect, except in one or two rare
instances indeed. It is only the _pantomime_ part of tragedy, the
exhibition of immediate and physical distress, that which gives the
greatest opportunity for ‘inexpressible dumb-show and noise,’ which is
sure to tell, and tell completely on the stage. All the rest, all that
appeals to our profounder feelings, to reflection and imagination, all
that affects us most deeply in our closets, and in fact constitutes the
glory of Shakespear, is little else than an interruption and a drag on
the business of the stage. _Segnius per aures demissa_, &c. Those parts
of the play on which the reader dwells the longest, and with the highest
relish in the perusal, are hurried through in the performance, while the
most trifling and exceptionable are obtruded on his notice, and occupy
as much time as the most important. We do not mean to say that there is
less knowledge or display of mere stage-effect in Shakespear than in
other writers, but that there is a much greater knowledge and display of
other things, which divide the attention with it, and to which it is not
possible to give an equal force in the representation. Hence it is, that
the reader of the plays of Shakespear is almost always disappointed in
seeing them acted; and, for our own parts, we should never go to see
them acted, if we could help it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account