The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 08 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 08 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
irresistible; and the language of music seems the language of nature and
passion. But when the sound becomes not only an echo to the sense, but
to itself—when the same alternation of bursts of heroic passion, and
thrillings of sentimental tenderness is constantly played off upon
us—when there is nothing but this trite transition from the _con furio_,
_con strepito_, to the _affettuoso_ and _adagio_ style, in their
greatest extremes—we then begin to perceive something like a trick, and
are little more affected than by reading the marginal directions in a
music book. The inspiration of genius is fled; that which before
breathed the very soul of music, becomes little better than a puppet,
and like all other puppets, is good only according to its compass, and
the number of evolutions it performs. We have here spoken of directness
and simplicity of style, as Mr. Braham’s _forte_ in singing; for though
we agree that he has too much ornament (a very little is too much), yet
we can by no means allow that this can be made an unqualified objection
to his style, for he has much less than other singers.
Of Mr. Phillips we would not wish to speak; but as he puts himself
forward and is put forward by others, we must say something. He is said
to be an imitator of Mr. Braham; if so, the imitation is a vile one.
This gentleman has one qualification, which has been said to be the
great secret of pleasing others, that he is evidently pleased with
himself. But he does not produce a corresponding effect upon us; we have
not one particle of sympathy with his wonderful self-complacency. We
should wish never to hear him sing again; or, if he must sing, at least,
we should hope never to see him act: let him not top his part—why should
he sigh, and ogle, and languish, and display all his accomplishments—he
should spare the side-boxes!—Mrs. Dickons never appeared to us any thing
but an ordinary musical instrument, and at present, she is very much out
of tune. We do not well understand what has been said of this piece
having called forth all the musical strength of the house: except
Braham’s, there was not a single song sung so as not to give pain, even
to a moderately cultivated ear. In this censure, we do not (of course)
include Miss Kelly; in seeing her, we never think of her singing. The
comic parts of this Opera (if such they can be called) were sustained by
Miss Kelly, Mr. Munden, and Mr. Knight. Miss Kelly did the little she
had to do, with that fine unobtrusive good sense, and reluctant
_naiveté_, which distinguish all her performances. If she carries her
shyness of the audience and of her profession to a fault, not so Mr.
Munden. He out-caricatures caricature, and out-grimaces himself. We have
seen him twice lately in the same character of a drunken confidant, and
were both times heartily tired. He is not only perfectly conscious what
he is about, but has a thorough understanding with the audience all
along.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account