The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 08 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 08 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
Of one of the actors who assisted at this sacrifice of poetical genius,
Emery, we think as highly as any one can do: he is indeed, in his way,
the most perfect actor on the stage. His representations of common
rustic life have an absolute identity with the thing represented. But
the power of his mind is evidently that of imitation, not that of
creation. He has nothing romantic, grotesque, or imaginary about him.
Every thing in his hands takes a local and habitual shape. Now, Caliban
is a mere creation; one of the wildest and most abstracted of all
Shakespear’s characters, whose deformity is only redeemed by the power
and truth of the imagination displayed in it. It is the essence of
grossness, but there is not the smallest vulgarity in it. Shakespear has
described the brutal mind of this man-monster in contact with the pure
and original forms of nature; the character grows out of the soil where
it is rooted uncontrouled, uncouth, and wild, uncramped by any of the
meannesses of custom. It is quite remote from any thing provincial; from
the manners or dialect of any county in England. Mr. Emery had nothing
of Caliban but his gaberdine, which did not become him. (We liked Mr.
Grimaldi’s Orson much better, which we saw afterwards in the pantomime.)
Shakespear has, by a process of imagination usual with him, drawn off
from Caliban the elements of every thing etherial and refined, to
compound them into the unearthly mould of Ariel. Nothing was ever more
finely conceived than this contrast between the material and the
spiritual, the gross and delicate. Miss Matthews played and sung Ariel.
She is to be sure a very ‘tricksy spirit:’ and all that we can say in
her praise is, that she is a better representative of the sylph-like
form of the character, than the light and portable Mrs. Bland, who used
formerly to play it. She certainly does not sing the songs so well. We
do not however wish to hear them sung, though never so well; no music
can add any thing to their magical effect.—The words of Shakespear would
be sweet, even ‘after the songs of Apollo!’
MY WIFE! WHAT WIFE?
_The Examiner._
_July 30, 1815._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account