The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 12 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 12 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
parts cannot be separated without injury from the whole. Such people
have no pleasure in the art as such: it is merely to astonish or to
thrive that they follow it; or, if thrown out of it by accident, they
regret it only as a bankrupt tradesman does a business which was a
handsome subsistence to him. Barry did not live, like Titian, on the
taste of colours (there was here, perhaps—and I will not disguise it—in
English painters in general, a defect of organic susceptibility); they
were not a _pabulum_ to his senses; he did not hold green, blue, red,
and yellow for ‘the darlings of his precious eye.’ They did not,
therefore, sink into his mind with all their hidden harmonies, nor
nourish and enrich it with material beauty, though he knew enough of
them to furnish hints for other ideas and to suggest topics of
discourse. If he had had the most enchanting object in nature before him
in his painting-room at the Adelphi, he would have turned from it, after
a moment’s burst of admiration, to talk of the subject of his next
composition, and to scrawl in some new and vast design, illustrating a
series of great events in history, or some vague moral theory. The art
itself was nothing to him, though he made it the stalking-horse to his
ambition and display of intellectual power in general; and, therefore,
he neglected its essential qualities to daub in huge allegories, or
carry on cabals with the Academy, in which the violence of his will and
the extent of his views found proper food and scope. As a painter, he
was tolerable merely as a draftsman, or in that part of the art which
may be best reduced to rules and precepts, or to positive measurements.
There is neither colouring, nor expression, nor delicacy, nor striking
effect in his pictures at the Adelphi. The group of youths and horses,
in the representation of the Olympic Games, is the best part of them,
and has more of the grace and spirit of a Greek bas-relief than any
thing of the same kind in the French school of painting. Barry was, all
his life, a thorn in the side of Sir Joshua, who was irritated by the
temper and disconcerted by the powers of the man; and who, conscious of
his own superiority in the exercise of his profession, yet looked
askance at Barry’s loftier pretensions and more gigantic scale of art.
But he had no more occasion to be really jealous of him than of an Irish
porter or orator. It was like Imogen’s mistaking the dead body of Cloten
for her lord’s—‘the jovial thigh, the brawns of Hercules’: the head,
which would have detected the cheat, was missing!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account