The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 12 (of 12)Hazlitt, William
General
The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 12 (of 12)
Hazlitt, William
English essays -- 19th century
There was nothing so odious or contemptible but it found a
sanctuary in the more odious and contemptible perversity of human
nature. The barbarous Gods of antiquity reigned _in contempt of their
worshippers_!
This game was carried on through all the first ages of the world, and is
still kept up in many parts of it; and it is impossible to describe the
wars, massacres, horrors, miseries and crimes, to which it gave colour,
sanctity, and sway. The idea of a God, beneficent and just, the
invisible maker of all things, was abhorrent to their gross, material
notions. No, they must have Gods of their own making, that they could
see and handle, that they knew to be nothing in themselves but senseless
images, and these they daubed over with the gaudy emblems of their own
pride and passions, and these they lauded to the skies, and grew fierce,
obscene, frantic before them, as the representatives of their sordid
ignorance and barbaric vices. TRUTH, GOOD, were idle names to them,
without a meaning. They must have a lie, a palpable, pernicious lie, to
pamper their crude, unhallowed conceptions with, and to exercise the
untameable fierceness of their wills. The Jews were the only people of
antiquity who were withheld from running headlong into this abomination;
yet so strong was the propensity in them (from inherent frailty as well
as neighbouring example) that it could only be curbed and kept back by
the hands of Omnipotence.[44] At length, reason prevailed over
imagination so far, that these brute idols and their altars were
overturned; it was thought too much to set up stocks and stones, Golden
Calves and Brazen Serpents, as _bonâ-fide_ Gods and Goddesses, which men
were to fall down and worship at their peril—and Pope long after summed
up the merits of the whole mythologic tribe in a handsome distich—
‘Gods partial, changeful, passionate, unjust,
Whose attributes were rage, revenge, or lust.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account