The Collected Writing of Thomas De Quincey, Vol. IIDe Quincey, Thomas
History
The Collected Writing of Thomas De Quincey, Vol. II
De Quincey, Thomas
De Quincey, Thomas, 1785-1859; English literature -- 19th century
In short, whether a man differ from others by greater
profundity or by greater sublimity, and whether he write as a poet
or as a philosopher, in any case, he feels, in due proportion to the
necessities of his intellect, an increasing dependence upon the Latin
section of the English language; and the true reason why Lord Brougham
failed to perceive this, or found the Saxon equal to his wants, is one
which I shall not scruple to assign, inasmuch as it does not reflect
personally on Lord Brougham, or, at least, on him exclusively, but
on the whole body to which he belongs. That thing which he and they
call by the pompous name of statesmanship, but which is, in fact,
_statescraft_--the art of political intrigue--deals (like the opera)
with ideas so few in number, and so little adapted to associate
themselves with other ideas, that, possibly, in the one case equally
as in the other, six hundred words are sufficient to meet all their
demands.
[14] The diction of Milton is a case absolutely unique in
literature: of many writers it has been said, but of him only
with truth, that he created a peculiar language. The value must be
tried by the result, not by inferences from _a priori_ principles;
such inferences might lead us to anticipate an unfortunate result;
whereas, in fact, the diction of Milton is such that no other
could have supported his majestic style of thinking. The final
result is a _transcendent_ answer to all adverse criticism; but
still it is to be lamented that no man properly qualified has
undertaken the examination of the Miltonic diction as a separate
problem. Listen to a popular author of this day (Mr. Bulwer). He,
speaking on this subject, asserts (_England and the English_, p.
329) that "_there is scarcely an English idiom which Milton has
not violated, or a foreign one which he has not borrowed_." Now,
in answer to this extravagant assertion, I will venture to say
that the two following are the sole cases of questionable idiom
throughout Milton:--1st, "Yet virgin of Proserpina from Jove";
and, in this case, the same thing might be urged in apology which
Aristotle urges in another argument, namely, that [Greek: anônumon
to pathos], the case is unprovided with _any_ suitable expression.
How would it be possible to convey in good English the
circumstances here indicated: viz. that Ceres was yet in those
days of maiden innocence, when she had borne no daughter to Jove?
2d, I will cite a case which, so far as I remember, has been
noticed by no commentator; and, probably, because they have failed
to understand it. The case occurs in the "Paradise Regained"; but
where I do not at this moment remember. "Will they _transact_ with
God?" [The only case of the use of the word _transact_ by Milton
registered in the Verbal Indexes is in _Par. Lost_, vi. 286, where
Satan says, "Easier to transact with me."--M.] This is the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account