The Color Line: A Brief in Behalf of the Unborn — John Shaqi
The Color Line: A Brief in Behalf of the UnbornSmith, William Benjamin
History
The Color Line: A Brief in Behalf of the Unborn
Smith, William Benjamin
African Americans
But some one will say that we are fighting "bogies"; that no one in the
North, much less in the South, desires any such amalgamation. Do not
believe it! The intense, the supreme yearning of large bodies of
Negroes is for social recognition among the Whites--more especially for
intermarriage with their haughty, old-time despisers. Who does not know
this, simply does not understand the dominant facts of Southern
life.[15] True, there may be no longer anyone in the North that openly
advocates miscegenation--no one that would welcome or even tolerate it
in his family, though we remember to have read years ago a distinct
declaration, by no mean authority, that it might be a positive
advantage to pour the strong, rich blood of the Black man into the
languid veins of the Southern Whites! However, granted that all would
NOW[16] disavow such a sentiment--and let us accept the disavowal
unreservedly--the fact remains that the highest authorities in the
North, the factors that form public opinion and guide legislation, have
never yet to our knowledge raised their voices against miscegenation in
the South. What means this expressive silence? In this momentous,
all-overshadowing controversy, there is no middle ground. He that is
not against amalgamation is for it. Who so does not oppose must _ipso
facto_ favour it. Only ciphers are neither plus nor minus.
[15] Nor do we see how any one can blame them. Especially the
intelligent Mulatto recognizes, and justly, that social equality,
with its necessary corollary, intermarriage, is the key of the
whole position. Without it, he sees clearly that his race is
doomed. From his point of view, the denial of such equality
appears as a colossal injustice, an immeasurable wrong. And
unless he be racially inferior, he is incontrovertibly right.
[16] We are not willing to deface these pages with passages
quoted in proof of the fact that miscegenation has been advocated
openly and repeatedly in the highest quarters, and doubtless in
all good faith and good will. But he who has any doubt on this
point may consult the _Edinburgh Review_ of 1827, pp. 390-394;
Lyell's "Second Visit to the United States," 1849, Vol. II., p.
216; The Fourth of July Speech of Mr. Wendell Phillips (1863);
the speeches of Mr. Theodore Tilton, sometime editor of _The
Independent_; but especially the collection of pamphlets entitled
"Miscegenation," by D. G. Croly and others (1864), wherein "not
only the propriety, but the necessity, of the marriage of Black
and White" is argued passionately. Abominable as such doctrines
may sound, they flow inevitably from the principles even at this
date commonly accepted in both Englands, and they can be proved
_wrong_ only by proving that our present contentions are _right_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account