Biographical fiction; French fiction -- Translations into English
“Madame,” said Popinot, “when M. d’Espard left you, did he not give
you a power of attorney enabling you to manage and control your own
affairs?”
“I do not understand the object of all these questions,” said the
Marquise with petulance. “It seems to me that if you would only consider
the state in which I am placed by my husband’s insanity, you ought to be
troubling yourself about him, and not about me.”
“We are coming to that, madame,” said the judge. “Before placing in
your hands, or in any others, the control of M. d’Espard’s property,
supposing he were pronounced incapable, the Court must inquire as to how
you have managed your own. If M. d’Espard gave you the power, he would
have shown confidence in you, and the Court would recognize the fact.
Had you any power from him? You might have bought or sold house property
or invested money in business?”
“No, monsieur, the Blamont-Chauvrys are not in the habit of trading,”
said she, extremely nettled in her pride as an aristocrat, and
forgetting the business in hand. “My property is intact, and M. d’Espard
gave me no power to act.”
The Chevalier put his hand over his eyes not to betray the vexation
he felt at his sister-in-law’s short-sightedness, for she was ruining
herself by her answers. Popinot had gone straight to the mark in spite
of his apparent doublings.
“Madame,” said the lawyer, indicating the Chevalier, “this gentleman, of
course, is your near connection? May we speak openly before these other
gentlemen?”
“Speak on,” said the Marquise, surprised at this caution.
“Well, madame, granting that you spend only sixty thousand francs
a year, to any one who sees your stables, your house, your train of
servants, and a style of housekeeping which strikes me as far more
luxurious than that of the Jeanrenauds, that sum would seem well laid
out.”
The Marquise bowed an agreement.
“But,” continued the judge, “if you have no more than twenty-six
thousand francs a year, you may have a hundred thousand francs of debt.
The Court would therefore have a right to imagine that the motives which
prompt you to ask that your husband may be deprived of the control of
his property are complicated by self-interest and the need of paying
your debts--if--you--have--any. The requests addressed to me have
interested me in your position; consider fully and make your confession.
If my suppositions have hit the truth, there is yet time to avoid the
blame which the Court would have a perfect right to express in the
saving clauses of the verdict if you could not show your attitude to be
absolutely honorable and clear.
“It is our duty to examine the motives of the applicant as well as
to listen to the plea of the witness under examination, to ascertain
whether the petitioner may not have been prompted by passion, by a
desire for money, which is unfortunately too common----”
The Marquise was on Saint Laurence’s gridiron.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account