The Common Nature of Epidemics, and their relation to climate and civilizationSmith, Southwood
History
The Common Nature of Epidemics, and their relation to climate and civilization
Smith, Southwood
Communicable diseases; Epidemics; Quarantine
7. An extraordinary stillness and stagnation of the air, both by day and
night. Sometimes in the low-lying districts not a breath could be
observed. Even when at more elevated stations the wind was moving with a
force of 1 lb 7 oz., the pressure was only ¼ lb in the heart of London.
Wind is the ventilator of nature. Artificial ventilation, as far as it
is successful, is an imitation of nature’s process. It is stated on
undoubted authority (Maitland’s History of London) that for several
weeks before the Great Plague broke out in London, there was an
uninterrupted calm, so that there was not sufficient motion of the air
to stir a vane. Baynard, a contemporary physician, confirms this fact.
The like circumstance is mentioned by Diemerbroeck in giving an account
of the plague at Nimeguen. At the period when the last plague visited
Vienna, according to Sir Gilbert Blane, there had been no wind for three
months. The terrific outbreak of the cholera at Kurrachee was preceded
for some days by such a stagnation of the atmosphere that an oppression
scarcely to be endured affected the whole population. It is obvious that
calms must favour the accumulation and concentration of effluvia from
every source from which they arise.
8. A general deficiency in the tension of common positive electricity.
9. A deficiency of one fourth of the rain-fall for the year. During 118
consecutive days there was scarcely any rain, and not a single drop for
18 days at the period of the highest mortality.
10. A total absence of ozone at all the stations near the river, while
at stations of high elevation it was of general occurrence.
These observations relate particularly to the epidemic of 1854, which
was more carefully watched than the two former; but the results are
similar for each.
“The three epidemics,” says Mr Glashier, in summing up the results of
his inquiry, “were attended with a particular state of atmosphere,
characterized by a prevalent mist, thin in high places, dense in low.
During the height of the epidemic, in all cases, the reading of the
barometer was remarkably high, the atmosphere thick; and in 1849 and
1854 the temperature above its average. A total absence of rain, and a
stillness of air amounting almost to calm, accompanied the progress of
the disease on each occasion. In places near the river, the night
temperatures were high, with small diurnal range, with a dense torpid
mist and air charged with the many impurities arising from the
exhalations of the Thames, and adjoining marshes; a deficiency of
electricity, and, as shown in 1854, a total absence of ozone, most
probably destroyed by the decomposition of the organic matter with which
the air in these situations is so strongly charged.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account