The Common Nature of Epidemics, and their relation to climate and civilizationSmith, Southwood
History
The Common Nature of Epidemics, and their relation to climate and civilization
Smith, Southwood
Communicable diseases; Epidemics; Quarantine
1. That Epidemics are under our own control; we may promote their
spread; we may prevent it. We may secure ourselves from them. We have
done so. We have banished the most formidable. Those that remain are not
so difficult to be conquered as those that have been vanquished. The
causes of Typhus are more completely under our control than those of
Intermittent. We have banished Intermittent. We may put an end to
Typhus. We have actually done so. We have encompassed the Model
Dwellings by a barrier which neither typhus, nor even cholera, nor any
of the other causes of excessive sickness and premature mortality have
been able to pass. To the residents within that barrier the chance of
life has been almost doubled; to their children it has been doubled; and
compared with some other children of their own class it has been
increased fourfold.
2. We see that Epidemics are not made by a Divine law the necessary
condition of man’s existence upon earth. The boon of life is not marred
with this penalty. The great laws of nature, which are God’s ordinances
in their regular course and appointed operation, do form and give off
around us, products which are injurious to us; but He has given us
senses to perceive them, and reason to devise the means of avoiding
them, and epidemics arise and spread because we will not regard the one,
nor use the other.
3. We see that there are circumstances which render it doubtful whether
civilization has yet attained a point that places it beyond the danger
of retrogression. States in some respects of higher civilization than
our own have relapsed into barbarism. There is indeed one circumstance
which may give us hope; there is one humanizing principle which is now
at least recognized and in partial operation, of which there is no trace
in any nation of antiquity. I mean the principle of kindness as a
governing influence, distinguished from the principle of brute force.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account