The Common Nature of Epidemics, and their relation to climate and civilizationSmith, Southwood
History
The Common Nature of Epidemics, and their relation to climate and civilization
Smith, Southwood
Communicable diseases; Epidemics; Quarantine
Complaints were made that the result of the inquiry was prejudged. In
proof of this it was found that the President of the Board, a few days
before it held its first meeting, addressed to the military secretary of
the garrison an official letter in which, among other observations
directly tending to a prejudgment of the case, he affirms, that “the
fever in question has often been traced to importation, and against this
source _only_ must we look for its prevention.”
It appears further that before the meeting of the Board an official
intimation of the views and wishes of the local authorities was
promulgated in the Government Gazette, into which nothing is admitted
but by authority, in the following words:—
“The scourge from which we have been by Divine Providence just delivered
must be an exotic of some kind. It is in its origin independent of
everything inherent in the soil which we inhabit, incapable of existing
among us during the winter months, and totally distinct from and
unconnected with the Remitting and Intermitting Fever, which may be said
to be unknown in this garrison.”
“Two causes,” observes Mr Howell, “concurred to operate injuriously upon
the proceedings of the Board: _First_, the conviction universally
prevalent among the _civil_ population of Gibraltar, that the prosperity
of that community would be undermined if it should be proved that the
epidemic had been generated on the spot, because of the prohibitions and
restrictions which it was anticipated would in that case be inflicted
upon its commercial intercourse with other places. Hence the notion that
not only the last epidemic, but that all its predecessors had been
imported from some foreign country was not only anxiously supported by
the unanimous voice of the civil community, but it was with equal
unanimity believed that a different doctrine would be fatal to the
commercial prosperity of the place. From this feeling of self-interest
it is to be admitted that the _military_ were exempt, a distinction
between the two classes which ought to be taken into account in
estimating the value of the evidence taken by the Board, and more
especially the evidence of the medical practitioners.
“The _second_ cause operating injuriously upon this inquiry was the
publication, in the official government newspaper (into which nothing is
admitted except by official authority), on January 12, 1829, of an
article authoritatively announcing that the late epidemic had been
imported into Gibraltar, and denouncing as void of common sense any
person who should hold a different opinion. This official notification
of the feelings of the local Government (preceding as it did by only 12
days the appointment of the Board of Inquiry) could hardly fail to
encourage evidence on one side, and discourage evidence on the other.”
Complaints were also made that there was a partial selection of
witnesses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account