The commonwealth of cells : $b Some popular essays on human physiologySpurrell, H. G. F. (Herbert George Flaxman)
Science
The commonwealth of cells : $b Some popular essays on human physiology
Spurrell, H. G. F. (Herbert George Flaxman)
Human physiology
A step higher in the animal scale, or a further advance in the
development of the schematic embryo (depicted in Diagrams 3 to 6), and
we find that these special digestive cells are losing their sturdier
qualities and being placed in a position protected by cells which have
specialized in another direction. This is shown in Diagram 4, where the
hollow ball of cells which resulted from the repeated division of one
cell is represented in section. One side of the ball is pushed in, and
now the beast consists of two layers of cells, an outer protecting and
an inner digesting (Hydra and sea-anemone). Soon, however, it is found
more convenient to have a tube for digesting food, for then different
substances can be digested and absorbed in different parts; and the
refuse, of which the animal can make no use, need not be brought back to
the mouth to be got rid of.
This, however, requires a number of other changes in the structure of
the animal, which are roughly shown in Diagrams 5 and 6. It is not to
our purpose here to discuss the development of animals or an animal; but
the figures are worth glancing at, as they show not only how certain of
the cells are set apart for digesting food, but also that a large body
consists really only of a mass of protoplasm, composing kindred cells of
common origin.
[Illustration: DIAGRAM 6.—SHOWING DEVELOPMENT OF AN EMBRYO.]
Now, for obvious reasons, the longer, within certain limits, this tube is
the better. All sorts of different food-stuffs have to be acted upon in
it, and some offer considerable resistance to digestion; and the further
they have to travel in the tube, the more chance there is of their being
successfully treated. Besides, different parts have different functions,
and the longer the tube—again within necessary limits—the greater scope
is there for division of labour, and consequent economy. The comparative
length of the alimentary canal is not the same in all animals by any
means. Carnivorous animals, like the cat, whose food is soft and easily
digested, have a fairly short one. Herbivora, like the sheep, whose
food is difficult to digest and mixed with much husk, which is wholly
indigestible, have a comparatively very long one. Man, who is omnivorous,
but eats less and more judiciously chosen food than either of the above
classes, has one of medium length. But in all cases among the higher
animals there is an attempt made to obviate the necessity of increasing
the length of the animal by coiling the tube within the body. The annexed
diagram (7) illustrates this principle. It shows a schematic animal whose
digestive canal is much longer than itself.
[Illustration: DIAGRAM 7.—SHOWING HOW THE DIGESTIVE CANAL IS LENGTHENED.]
[Illustration: DIAGRAM 8.—CROSS-SECTION OF THE DIGESTIVE TUBE.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account