The commonwealth of cells : $b Some popular essays on human physiologySpurrell, H. G. F. (Herbert George Flaxman)
Science
The commonwealth of cells : $b Some popular essays on human physiology
Spurrell, H. G. F. (Herbert George Flaxman)
Human physiology
This definition may seem a little cryptic to some people, and very
shocking to others. ‘Life,’ many people are accustomed to say, ‘means the
presence of a soul, and is supernatural; and as to its being a question
of chemical composition, that is absurd. My being made of cells, too,
will not account for my thinking.’ But when people dogmatize thus about
what they have not considered, they usually find themselves landed in
difficulties. They go so fast: the most spiritual of men is so dependent
upon matter and its properties that his soul will speedily quit his body
if he is prevented from breathing. And the reason of this is, that if
he cannot get air, the chemistry of the cells of which his body is made
becomes altered; he no longer consists of protoplasm, therefore he no
longer lives. Life, that it may exist in a material world, must have
a material basis, and if that is interfered with it becomes extinct
or quits the material plane; in any case, ceases to interest the
physiologist as a physiologist. I do not think anyone need be shocked at
this being recognised.
It is, of course, the ambition of the physiologist to make protoplasm,
but so far he has got no further than making some of the complicated
bodies into which protoplasm breaks up when it dies. A little while ago
this bare possibility was loudly derided, but the advance in organic
chemistry has been so great of late years, and so many complicated
substances which once seemed as unobtainable as protoplasm itself have
been made in the laboratory, that we now have hope of a precise knowledge
of the chemistry of life some day, though that day may be yet very
distant.
To give an account of life is to describe as far as we are able the
nature of the living substance, protoplasm; and as protoplasm is a
‘structure of compounds,’ a word or two about chemical compounds may
clear the ground for discussing it. If you were to take a compound,
say a lump of sugar, and start breaking it up, you could hammer for a
very long time and it would be still sugar; but if a tiny fairy with a
minute hammer and chisel were to go on breaking up the grains, he would
ultimately have molecules of sugar before him. Each molecule would
consist of exactly the same number of atoms of carbon, hydrogen and
oxygen, and if he divided it further by the removal of a single atom, it
would no longer be sugar. He could hammer away at the atoms as hard as he
liked, for they are incapable of further division.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account