Stanes xxxv hid. Abb’ Stanwelle xv hid. Bedefunte x hid. alia Bedefunte x hid. Feltham xv hid. Kenetune v hid. Suneb[er]ia vij hid. Abb. Sep[er]tune viij hid. Abb. Hanewrtha v hid. iij Abb’ Summa c et x hid. IN HUNDREDO DE LA GARE. Herghes c hid. Kingesb[er]ia x hid. Stanmere ix hid. Terra com’ vj hid. Alia Stanmere ix. hid. et dim. Heneclune[528] xx hid. Abb. Summa c et xl et ix hid. IN DIMIDIO HUNDREDO DE MIMES lxx hid. Toteham [5][529] hid. Edelmetune [35][529] hid. Mimes [35][529] hid. Enefeld xxx hid. Summa lx et ix hid. Summa summarum octies c et liij hid. et dimid. Summa Hidarum Abbatie Westm’. c et xviij hid. DANEGELD. Middelsexe quater xx libr’ et c sol. et vj d. Londr’ c et xx libr. SUMMA HUNDREDORUM. Osuluestane cc et xj hid. Spelthorn c et x hid. Elethorn c et xxiiij hid. Garehundr’ c et xlix hid. et dim. Thistelwrkhundr’ c et v hid. Explicit de comitatu de Middelsexe. This list obviously requires to be edited by a local worker, who should collate it with Domesday. In its present form it is clearly corrupt. The amount of Danegeld due from the county implies an assessment of 850¼ hides (at two shillings on the hide), but the actual total is here given as 853½. This again does not tally with the “summa hundredorum,” which only records 809½,[530] while the detailed list of hundreds, it seems, gives no more than 725½. It should be observed that the hundred of “Mimms” is the Domesday hundred of Edmonton, while that of ‘Isleworth,’ similarly, is the Domesday hundred of Hounslow, which contained Isleworth and Hampton. XII The Great Inquest of Service, 1212