The Commune of London, and other studiesRound, John Horace
History
The Commune of London, and other studies
Round, John Horace
Great Britain -- History -- Norman period, 1066-1154; London (England) -- History -- To 1500
In two papers I deal with Ireland and its Anglo-Norman conquest. The
principal object in the first of these is to show the true character of
that alleged golden age which the coming of the invaders destroyed. It
is possible, however, of course, that a “vast human shambles” may be,
in the eyes of some, an ideal condition for a country. Mr. Dillon, at
least, has consistently described the Soudan, before our conquest, as
“a comparatively peaceful country.”[1] In the second of these papers I
advance a new solution of the problem raised by the alleged grant of
Ireland, by the Pope, to Henry II. As to this fiercely contested point,
I suggest that, on the English side, there was a conspiracy to base the
title of our kings to Ireland on a Papal donation of the sovereignty
of the island, itself avowedly based on the (forged) “donation of
Constantine.” No such act of the Popes can, in my opinion, be proved.
Even the “Bull Laudabiliter,” which, in the form we have it, is of
no authority, does not go so far as this, while its confirmation by
Alexander III. is nothing but a clumsy forgery. The only document sent
to Ireland, to support his rights, by Henry II. was, I here contend,
the letter of Alexander III. (20th September, 1172), approving of what
had been done. That he sent there the alleged bull of Adrian, and that
he did so in 1175, are both, I urge, although accepted, facts without
foundation.[2]
The method adopted in this paper of testing the date hitherto adopted,
and disproving it by the sequence of events, is one which I have also
employed in “The Struggle of John and Longchamp (1191).” The interest
of this latter paper consists in its bearing on the whole question
of historic probability, and on the problem of harmonising narratives
by four different witnesses, as discussed by Dr. Abbott in his work
on St. Thomas of Canterbury. This is, perhaps, the only instance in
which I have found the historic judgment and the marvellous insight
of the Bishop of Oxford, if I may venture to say so, at fault; and it
illustrates the importance of minute attention to the actual dates of
events.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account